3.The petitioner describes the modus operandi in detail in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition. His statements are not made in the air. He provides solid proof and justification. The second respondent is the authority to procure books for the public libraries in the State of Tamil Nadu. He would issue notifications calling for response from publishers interested in supplying books. Though one of the conditions would be that the year of the publication of the book should not be changed, instances are galore indicating to the contrary. For instance, ''Veeram Vilaintha Varalatru Puthinangal Part-I' (tPuk; tpise;j tuyhw;Wg; Gjpdq;fs; gFjp-1) which was published in the year 2013, is nothing but a copy of Kalki's Sivakamiyin Sabatham (rptfhkpapd; rgjk;). The petitioner points out that the books of writers of yore such as Thiru Vi Ka, A.Sa.Gnana Sambanthan, Na.Parthasarathy, etc, have been re-published as if they are of recent