Dismissed

M.Ansari v. Sellancheri Thaikka Wakf

Madras HC23 Aug 2024WP/995/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court dismissed two Writ Petitions and connected miscellaneous petitions filed under Article 226. The petitions, originally seeking writs of mandamus to restrain registration of Wakf property transfers, were admitted under interim orders permitting withdrawal with liberty.

What did the court decide?

Withdrawal of writ petitions permitted with liberty to apply to competent authority; connected miscellaneous petitions closed.

M.Ansari Vs Sellancheri Thaikka Wakf — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.Nos.995 & 996 of 2012

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 23.08.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

¶6

W.P.Nos.995 & 996 of 2012

¶7

and

¶8

MP.Nos.1 of 2012 (2 Nos.)

¶9

M.Ansari

¶10

...Petitioner in both W.P's.

¶11

Vs.

¶12

Sellancheri Thaikka Wakf, Rep. by its Muthawalli, Sellancheri & Post - 605 106, Cuddalore Taluk.

¶13

The Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, Rep. by its Chief Executive Officer, No.1, Jaffer Syrang Street, Vallal Seethakazhi Nagar, Chennai - 600 001.

¶14

The Wakf Superintendent, Cuddalore District, Cuddalore.

¶15

The District Registrar, Manjakuppam, Cuddalore, Cuddalore District.

¶16

The First Joint Sub Registrar, Manjakuppam, Cuddalore.

¶17

Mohamed Ali Jinna

¶18

Abdul Wahab

¶19

G.Abdul Rasheed

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

1/6

¶22

W.P.Nos.995 & 996 of 2012

¶23

9. R.Perumal 10. S.Umasenkar

¶24

R9 & R10 impleaded as per order dated 17.12.2012 made in MP.Nos.2, 2 & 3 of 2012 in WP.Nos.995 & 996 of 2012.

¶25

...Respondents in W.P.No.995 of 2012

¶26

Vs.

¶27

Sellancheri Dargha Wakf, Rep. by its Muthawalli, Sellancheri & Post - 605 106, Cuddalore Taluk.

¶28

The Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, Rep. by its Chief Executive Officer, No.1, Jaffer Syrang Street, Vallal Seethakazhi Nagar, Chennai - 600 001.

¶29

The Wakf Superintendent,

¶30

Cuddalore District, Cuddalore.

¶31

The District Registrar, Manjakuppam, Cuddalore, Cuddalore District.

¶32

The First Joint Sub Registrar, Manjakuppam, Cuddalore.

¶33

Mohamed Ali Jinna

¶34

Abdul Wahab 8. G.Abdul Rasheed 9. P.Parinathan 10. R.Perumal 11. S.Umasenkar

¶35

R9 to R11 impleaded as per order dated 17.12.2012 made in MP.Nos.2, 2 & 3 of 2012 in WP.Nos.995 & 996 of 2012. ...Respondents in W.P.No.996 of 2012

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

2/6

¶38

W.P.Nos.995 & 996 of 2012

¶39

Prayer in WP.No.995 of 2012: Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the 5^th respondent not to register any document in the nature of transfer by way of sale, gift, mortgage, exchange or lease with respect to the Sellancheri Thaikka Wakf properties situated in S.No.162, New Survey No.81/2 measuring an extent of 4.48 Acres in Sellencheri Village as under Section 51 of the Wakf Act and Section 22A of the Registration Act.

¶40

Prayer in WP.No.996 of 2012: Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the 5^th respondent not to register any document in the nature of transfer by way of sale, gift, mortgage, exchange or lease with respect to the Sellancheri Thaikka Wakf properties situated in S.No.114/7, 116/2, 116/4 and 61/2 measuring an extent of 17.62 Acres in Sellencheri Village as under Section 51 of the Wakf Act and Section 22A of the Registration Act.

¶41

In both WP's.:

¶42

For Petitioner : Mr.M.M.I.Khaleel For Respondents : Mr.T.Chezhian, AGP, for R4 & R5 : No Appearance, for R1, 3, 6 to 10 : No Appearance, for R2 (in W.P.No.995 of 2012) : Mr.Avinash Wadhani, for R2 (in W.P.No.996 of 2012)

¶43

COMMON ORDER

¶44

When the matters were taken up for hearing, the learned counsel

¶45

for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw these Writ Petitions with a liberty to file appropriate application before the competent authority, if any alienation is made in respect of the Wakf 3/6

¶46

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶47

W.P.Nos.995 & 996 of 2012

¶48

properties. An Endorsement to the said effect was also made by the

¶49

learned counsel for the petitioner in the Petition today.

¶50

Accordingly, these Writ Petitions stand dismissed as withdrawn

¶51

with a liberty as sought for by the learned counsel for the petitioner. No

¶52

costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶53

23.08.2024

¶54

skt

¶55

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Speaking Order : Yes / No

¶56

¶57

Sellancheri Dargha Wakf, Rep. by its Muthawalli, Sellancheri & Post - 605 106, Cuddalore Taluk.

¶58

The Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, Rep. by its Chief Executive Officer, No.1, Jaffer Syrang Street, Vallal Seethakazhi Nagar, Chennai - 600 001.

¶59

The Wakf Superintendent, Cuddalore District, Cuddalore.

¶60

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶61

4/6

¶62

W.P.Nos.995 & 996 of 2012

¶63

The District Registrar, Manjakuppam, Cuddalore, Cuddalore District.

¶64

The First Joint Sub Registrar, Manjakuppam, Cuddalore.

¶65

Sellancheri Thaikka Wakf, Rep. by its Muthawalli, Sellancheri & Post - 605 106, Cuddalore Taluk.

¶66

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶67

5/6

¶68

W.P.Nos.995 & 996 of 2012

¶69

M.DHANDAPANI, J.

¶70

skt

¶71

W.P.Nos.995 & 996 of 2012

¶72

and MP.Nos.1 of 2012 (2 Nos.)

¶73

23.08.2024

¶74

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶75

6/6

M.Ansari v. Sellancheri Thaikka Wakf

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Ansari v. Sellancheri Thaikka Wakf

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Charoen Pokphand (India) Vs The Chairman and Managing

D.Nalini Vs The Chief Manager

Vennila Vs District Collector

R.Vasantha Vs The Commissioner

R.Raghuraman Vs the District Registrar of Societies

Perumal Vs the Branch Manager