Disposed

Perumal v. the Branch Manager

Madras HC23 Aug 2024WP/24370/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition under Article 226, the petitioner sought a direction for the respondent bank to sanction an educational loan approved in principle. The Court dispensed with notice and directed the bank to process the application with a hearing within four weeks, disposing of the petition without adjudicating merits.

What did the court decide?

Direction to consider the educational loan application dated 04.12.2023 and pass appropriate orders within four weeks after affording an opportunity of hearing.

Perumal Vs the Branch Manager — Banking and Recovery | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No.24370 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 23.08.2024

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

¶6

W.P.No.24370 of 2024

Perumal

... Petitioner

Vs.

The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Keelapaluvur Branch, Nadu Raja Veedhi, Ariyalur Taluk, Ariyalur District – 621 707.

¶11

... Respondent

¶12

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to sanction the educational loan for the petitioner's daughter namely Sandhiya.P.S pursuing her B.E in ECE course at Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Engineering College by processing the petitioner's loan application vide ANS-CSIS-2927505-543210 dated 4^th December 2023.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.A.V.Raja

¶14

¶15

Page No.1 of 4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

W.P.No.24370 of 2024

¶18

ORDER

¶19

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking for a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent to sanction the educational loan for the petitioner's daughter namely Sandhiya.P.S pursuing her B.E in ECE course at Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Engineering College by processing the petitioner's loan application vide ANSCSIS-2927505-543210 dated 04.12.2023.

¶20

Since no adverse order has been passed against the respondent, notice to the respondent is dispensed with.

¶21

The case of the petitioner is that, he has applied educational loan for his daughter in the respondent bank to a tune of Rs.4,00,000/- to meet her educational needs and the same was digitally approved on 04.12.2023. However, till date, the respondent bank has not sanctioned or processed the said loan. Therefore, the petitioner has come forward with the present writ petition for appropriate orders.

¶22

Though very many grounds have been raised in this writ petition, learned

¶23

counsel for the petitioner submitted that, it would suffice, if this Court issues a

¶24

Page No.2 of 4

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

W.P.No.24370 of 2024

¶27

direction to the respondent to sanction the petitioner's educational loan application

¶28

dated 04.12.2023 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a particular time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶29

Considering the limited request sought for by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court, without going into the merits of the case, directs the respondent to consider the petitioner's educational loan application dated 04.12.2023 and pass appropriate orders, on merits and in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as aggrieved persons if any, within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶30

With the above observation, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶31

23.08.2024

¶32

Index : Yes / No Speaking Order / Non-speaking order Neutral Citation Case : Yes / No sp

¶33

Page No.3 of 4

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.24370 of 2024

M.DHANDAPANI,J.

The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Keelapaluvur Branch, Nadu Raja Veedhi, Ariyalur Taluk, Ariyalur District – 621 707.

W.P.No.24370 of 2024

23.08.2024

Page No.4 of 4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Perumal v. the Branch Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Perumal v. the Branch Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Charoen Pokphand (India) Vs The Chairman and Managing

D.Nalini Vs The Chief Manager

Vennila Vs District Collector

R.Vasantha Vs The Commissioner

R.Raghuraman Vs the District Registrar of Societies

M.Ansari Vs Sellancheri Thaikka Wakf