amount shall be paid in between 1974 to 1993, the very communication for recovery of that amount has been issued only in the year 1996 in Na. Ka.4529/96 vide order dated 25.06.1996. The demand has been made thereafter and the amount has been paid by Lakshmiammal. Therefore, this court is of the view that merely because the amount has not been paid strictly in accordance with the instalment as ordered by the Tahsildar vide order dated 26.07.1973, it cannot be said that the title automatically revert back to the temple. If any arrears or any amount as fixed under Section 8 of the Act, while granting patta under the Minor Inam Abolition Act, remains unpaid the same shall be recovered as arrears of land revenue as per Section 8(3)(i) of Tamil Nadu Minor Inam (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1963, as the authority competent to determine the amount is the Tahsildar as per the schedule appended to Rule 43 of the Tamil Nadu Minor Inam (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Rules, 1965. Therefore, when the amounts have been properly determined and collected, of course there is some delay, the delay cannot be put against the writ petitioner and temple cannot claim title merely on the ground of such delay, when the rights of temple have already been decided in the proceedings initiated under the Act 30 of 1963. Such orders have reached
