Allowed

K.Shanmugam v. the District Collector

Madras HC12 Jun 2024WP/11768/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the writ petition, quashing the revenue authority's rejection of patta application on the ground of a pending civil suit, as the suit had been decreed by compromise, and directed the authority to decide the appeal afresh within one month.

What did the court decide?

Impugned proceedings quashed; Revenue Divisional Officer directed to decide appeal afresh within one month.

K.Shanmugam Vs the District Collector — Property and Title | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

WP.No.11768 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 12.06.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR

¶6

W.P.No.11768 of 2024

K.Shanmugam

.. Petitioner

Versus

The District Collector, Chennai District, Chennai.

¶11

The District Revenue Officer, Chennai District, Chennai.

¶12

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ambattur revenue Division, Chennai.

¶13

The Tahsildar, Aynavaram Taluk Office, Ayanavaram, Chennai – 23.

¶14

V.Haridoss

¶15

V.Natarajan .. Respondents

¶16

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the Na.Ka.No.391/2020/A2, dated 27.07.2020 quash the same and direct the third respondent to issue patta in favour of the petitioner.

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

1/5

¶19

WP.No.11768 of 2024

¶20

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Srivenkatesh For Respondents : Mr.P.Sathish Additional Government Pleader

¶21

ORDER

¶22

With the consent of both sides, this Writ Petition is taken up for final

¶23

disposal at the admission stage itself.

¶24

This writ petition is filed to quash the impugned proceedings of he third respondent in Na.Ka.No.391/2020/A2, dated 27.07.2020 and direct the third respondent to issue patta in favour of the petitioner.

¶25

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional

¶26

Government Pleader appearing for the respondents and perused the materials available on record.

¶27

The case of the writ petitioner is that subject property has been purchased by the petitioner by way of a registered sale deed dated 29.06.2016. The grievance of the petitioner is that when he applied for patta, the same was rejected on the ground that the property for which patta was applied is a part of

¶28

the suit schedule property in O.S.No.6000 of 2014 pending before the VII https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

2/5

¶30

WP.No.11768 of 2024

¶31

Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai. Now, it is the contention of the petitioner that in the said suit the petitioner has been impleaded and the parties have entered into a compromise and the suit was decreed in terms of compromise. Hence, the present Writ Petition has been filed for quashing the proceedings of the third respondent and to direct the third respondent to issue patta to the petitioner.

¶32

The contention of the petitioner is that the suit itself has been decreed in terms of compromise entered between the parties. In such view of the matter, the Order passed by the third respondent cannot be sustained and it has to be quashed.

¶33

Accordingly, this Writ Petition is allowed and the impugned proceedings of the third respondent dated 27.07.2020 stands quashed and on production of the compromise decree passed in the suit in O.S.No.6000 of 2014 by the petitioner, the third respondent is directed to decide the appeal filed by the petitioner on 17.12.2019 afresh and pass Orders on merits after affording opportunity to all the parties concerned within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order. No costs.

¶34

12.06.2024

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

3/5

WP.No.11768 of 2024

vrc

Index :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No

¶40

To,

¶41

The District Collector, Chennai District, Chennai.

¶42

The District Revenue Officer, Chennai District, Chennai.

¶43

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ambattur revenue Division, Chennai.

¶44

The Tahsildar, Aynavaram Taluk Office, Ayanavaram, Chennai – 23.

¶45

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶46

4/5

¶47

WP.No.11768 of 2024

¶48

N. SATHISH KUMAR, J.

¶49

vrc

¶50

W.P.No.11768 of 2024

¶51

12.06.2024

¶52

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶53

5/5

K.Shanmugam v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Shanmugam v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Selvi Vs the District Registrar

Indian Red cross society Vs The Special District Revenue officer (La)

N.Loganathan Vs The Sub Registrar

C.Anbalagan, Vs the District Collector

R.P.Mohan Vs The District Registrar

K.Rajesh Vs District Collector