Disposed
Anitha Manivasagam, v. the Commissioner
Madras HCWP/8084/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioner alleged adjoining construction without planning permission and sought a direction to the Commissioner to act on her representation. The Court, noting limited scope of prayer and service refusal by third respondent, directed consideration of the representation with local inspection, enquiry, and action within twelve weeks if building rules were violated.
What did the court decide?
Direction to first respondent to consider representation dated 04.03.2024, hold enquiry with opportunity to parties, and take action within twelve weeks if construction violates building rules.