Disposed

Y.Jeyakumar v. Union of India

Madras HC25 Mar 2024WP/7786/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Retired RPSF employee sought a writ of mandamus for grant of notional increment as on 01.07.2013 and reworking of pensionary benefits. The court, without expressing opinion on merits, directed the respondents to consider his case and pass appropriate orders within twelve weeks.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed to consider petitioner's case and pass appropriate orders on merits within twelve weeks.

Y.Jeyakumar Vs Union of India — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No.7786 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 25.03.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶6

W.P.No. 7786 of 2024

¶7

Y.Jeyakumar ..... Petitioner Vs 1.Union of India, rep. by Director General Railway Protection Force, Ministry of Railways, Railway Board, Rail Bhavan, New Delhi – 110 001. 2.Inspector General-cum-Principal Chief Security Commissioner, Railway Protection Special Force, Force Headquarters, RPSF Lines, Daya Basti, New Delhi – 110 035. 3. The Commanding Officer, 5^th Battalion, Railway Protection Special Force, Headquarters 5^th BN/RPSF, Kimber Garden, Khajamalai, Tiruchirappalli – 620 023. ..... Respondents

¶8

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to grant one notional increment as on 1^st July of the year of

¶9

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶10

Page 1 of 4

¶11

W.P.No.7786 of 2024

¶12

the petitioner's retirement (i.e., on 01.07.2013) and rework the pensionary benefits and other retiral benefits based on the last pay arrived at after grant of notional increment.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Pandian For R1 to R3 : Mr.S.Diwakar Central Government Senior Counsel

¶14

ORDER

¶15

This Writ Petition has been filed for a direction directing the

¶16

respondents to grant one notional increment as on 1^st July of the year of

¶17

the petitioner's retirement, i.e., on 01.07.2013 and rework the pensionary benefits and other retiral benefits based on the last pay arrived at after grant of notional increment.

¶18

Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials available on record.

¶19

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the writ

¶20

petition, the respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶21

With the above direction, this Writ Petition stands disposed

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Page 2 of 4

W.P.No.7786 of 2024

of. No costs.

25.03.2024

Internet: Yes Index : Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation : Yes/No Lpp To 1.The Director General, Union of India, Railway Protection Force, Ministry of Railways, Railway Board, Rail Bhavan, New Delhi – 110 001.

¶28

2.Inspector General-cum-Principal Chief Security Commissioner, Railway Protection Special Force, Force Headquarters, RPSF Lines, Daya Basti, New Delhi – 110 035.

¶29

The Commanding Officer, 5^th Battalion, Railway Protection Special Force, Headquarters 5^th BN/RPSF, Kimber Garden, Khajamalai, Tiruchirappalli – 620 023.

¶30

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN. J,

¶31

Lpp

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Page 3 of 4

W.P.No.7786 of 2024

W.P.No. 7786 of 2024

25.03.2024

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

Page 4 of 4

Y.Jeyakumar v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Y.Jeyakumar v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.P.Shanthi Vs the Secretary to Government

Mareeswaran K Vs the Chairperson

J.K.a.Kumararajah Vs the Regional Joint Director of Collegiate Education

Jayakumari Vs the Government of Tamil Nadu

G.Amutha Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

S.Prasath Vs the Government of Tamilnadu