V.Sriraman v. the Joint Director
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition filed to quash ECIR proceedings. The Supreme Court ruling in Vijay Madanlal Choudhary was applied, quashing the proceedings as the predicate offence was closed. Petition allowed.
What did the court decide?
Impugned proceedings in ECIR No.CEZO-I/17/2020 quashed.
What the court decided
W.P.No.6909 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 14.03.2024
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN
W.P.No.6909 of 2024 and W.M.P.No.7716 of 2024
1.V.Sriraman 2.V.Shankara Raman 3.Kamakshi Shankar Raman 4.R.Kalyanaraman 5.G.Venkatarajulu ... Petitioners Vs.
1.The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai Zonal Office-I, No.2,5th & 6th Floor, BSNL Administrative Building, Kushkumar Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034. 2.The Assistant Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai Zonal Office-I, II & III Floor, Murugesa Naicker Complex, No.84, Greams Road, Chennai-600 006. ... Respondents
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether ECIR proceedings should be quashed when the predicate offence has been closed by the Special Court.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V.Sriraman
- petitioner
V.Shankara Raman
- respondent
The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai Zonal Office-I
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court