the writ petitioner is merely an agent appointed in the year 2012. It is his contention that the power of attorney is coupled with interest, but on a perusal of the power of attorney, there is no material, whatsoever, even to infer the power is coupled with interest. Further, it is also to be noted that the power of attorney was cancelled as early as 2020. This fact is not in dispute. Therefore, merely on the basis of the power of attorney, one cannot make a claim over the property. The manner in which the petitioner making demand in the year 2024 in respect of an immovable property owned by somebody, makes it very clear that the petitioner's contention even assumed to be true, cannot be accepted. In fact he wants to lay the claim on the basis of the power of attorney, after passage of 12 years. What he could not achieve before the competent civil court, is trying to achieve before this court by way of filing this writ petition by citing the endorsement obtained by the respondents 4 to 6 before the registering authority, while obtaining certified copies. Even assuming that certified copies have been obtained, this court is of the view that considering fact that the original is already with the petitioner, preventing the owners from enjoying or dealing with the property, the owners have no other go except to obtain certified copies, as per the Government Order referred supra. Therefore, the respondents have opted to obtain the certified copies by citing some reasons. Even assuming
