Disposed

M.K.Ranganathan v. the District Registrar

Madras HC18 Jul 2024WP/4144/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A purchaser whose sale document was kept pending due to a court attachment on the vendor's property sought registration and cancellation of the vendor's subsequent sale to another buyer. The court directed the registration authorities to consider the representation, holding title questions belong in the pending civil suit.

What did the court decide?

Respondents 1 and 2 directed to consider the representation dated 25.08.2021 and pass orders on the pending document; liberty granted to recover sale consideration from vendor with interest; no costs.

M.K.Ranganathan Vs the District Registrar — Property and Title | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No.4144 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 18.07.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

¶6

W.P.No.4144 of 2024

¶7

M.K.Ranganathan ... Petitioner

¶8

versus

¶9

1.The District Registrar, Coimbatore – 641 041.

¶10

2.The Sub-Registrar, Gandhipuram, Coimbatore – 641 035.

3.Damodharan

4.K.R.Sivaraj

... Respondents

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1 st respondent to consider the petitioner's daughter representation dated 25.08.2021 consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2 to register the petitioner's pending document No.P73/2019 dated 05.04.2019.

¶15

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Nixon For Respondents : Mr.B.Vijay for R1 and R2 Additional Government Pleader No appearance for R3 Mr.L.Prabhakaran for R4

¶16

Page No: 1/6

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

W.P.No.4144 of 2024

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

This Writ Petition is filed to direct the 1 st respondent to consider the petitioner's daughter representation dated 25.08.2021 and consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2 to register the petitioner's pending document No.P73/2019 dated 05.04.2019.

¶21

It is the case of the petitioner that he had purchased the property situated in Survey No.67/8 in Chinnavedampatti Village, Coimbatore from the 3^rd respondent for a total sale consideration of Rs.44,54,000/-. However, the document was kept as a pending document vide Doc.No.P-73/2019 dated 05.04.2019 and the same has not been registered till date. All of a sudden, the 3^rd respondent executed another sale deed dated 15.02.2021 vide Doc.No.1790/21 in favour of the 4^th respondent without the knowledge of the petitioner. In this regard, the petitioner's daughter made a representation dated 25.08.2021 to the 1^st respondent seeking to cancel the subsequent document executed by the 3^rd respondent in favour of the 4^th respondent and to register the petitioner's pending document. However, the said representation was not considered by the official respondents. Hence, he seeks a direction.

¶22

Page No: 2/6

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

W.P.No.4144 of 2024

¶25

Learned counsel appearing for the 4^th respondent had filed a counter stating that the 4^th respondent had filed a suit in O.S.No.175 of 2018 against the 3^rd respondent for recovery of sum of Rs.63,00,000/- and an order of attachment was passed on 03.09.2018, the said order was made absolute on 24.09.2018, which has been communicated to the concerned Sub-Registrar. After the said attachment order, the 3^rd respondent executed the sale deed in favour of the petitioner on 05.04.2019. Only on account of the attachment order, the document was kept pending. Thereafter, the suit was decreed on 12.10.2020, based on the comprise entered between them. In lieu of discharge of part of the decree amount, the 4^th respondent purchased the property and registered the document vide document number 1790 of 2021 on the file of SRO Ganapathy, Coimbatore. In this regard, the writ petitioner filed a suit in O.S.No.3 of 2022 before the IV Additional District Judge, Coimbatore for declaration of title and the same is pending.

¶26

4 . This Court gave its anxious consideration to the submission advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents and perused the materials available on record.

¶27

Page No: 3/6

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

W.P.No.4144 of 2024

¶30

This Court is of the view that the writ petitioner has filed a suit in

¶31

O.S.No. 3 of 2022 and the rights over the title has to be decided by the Civil

¶32

Court. However, the respondents 1 and 2 are directed to consider the petitioner's daughter representation dated 25.08.2021 and pass orders with regard to the pending document, so that the petitioner can agitate his right in the pending suit. In any event, the petitioner had purchased the property during the existence of attachment. Therefore, liberty is granted to the petitioner to recover sale consideration from his vendor along with interest as per law.

¶33

With the above observation, this Writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶34

18.07.2024

¶35

Speaking order / Non-speaking order Index : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No

¶36

msv

¶37

1.The District Registrar, Coimbatore – 641 041.

¶38

2.The Sub-Registrar,

¶39

Page No: 4/6

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶41

W.P.No.4144 of 2024

¶42

Gandhipuram, Coimbatore – 641 035.

¶43

Page No: 5/6

¶44

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶45

W.P.No.4144 of 2024

¶46

N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.

¶47

msv

¶48

W.P.No.4144 of 2024

¶49

18.07.2024

¶50

Page No: 6/6

¶51

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

M.K.Ranganathan v. the District Registrar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.K.Ranganathan v. the District Registrar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sathyanarayanan Vs The Sub Registrar

Masilamani Vs the District Revenue Officer

Tamilarasi Vs the District Collector

The Authorized Officer Vs the Sub Registrar

Mani Vs the District Collector

M/S.Atikrmaya Builders, Vs the Inspector General of Registration