Disposed

Tamilarasi v. the District Collector

Madras HC16 Jul 2024WP/18832/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought removal of private respondents' names from a patta, claiming wrongful inclusion after her husband's death. The court directed the Collector, DRO and Tahsildar to consider her representation on merits, with notice to interested parties, within two months.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents 1-3 to dispose of petitioner's representation dated 17.11.2023 within two months, with notice to respondents 4-7.

Tamilarasi Vs the District Collector — Property and Title | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P. No.18832 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 16.07.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

¶6

W.P.No.18832 of 2024

Smt.Tamilarasi

... Petitioner

1.The District Collector Krishnagiri - 635 001

¶11

2.The District Revenue Officer Krishnagiri District Krishnagiri - 635 001

¶12

3.The Tahsildar Krishnagiri Taluk Krishnagiri - 635 001

¶13

4.P.Mani

¶14

5.P.Ramamoorthy

¶15

6.C.Mariappan

¶16

7.P.Mariappan

¶17

... Respondents

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ________

¶19

_______ Page 1/5_

¶20

W.P. No.18832 of 2024

¶21

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to remove the name of the respondents 4 to 7 from Patta No.2880 of Sundekuppam - 2 Village, Krishnagiri Taluk and District by considering the representation of the petitioner dated 17.11.2023.

¶22

For Petitioner : Mr.J.Bharathiraja For Respondent : Mr.A.Selvendran, Spl. Govt. Pleader for R1 to R3

¶23

O R D E R

¶24

This writ petition has been filed for a direction to the respondents 1 to 3

¶25

to remove the name of the respondents 4 to 7 from Patta No.2880 of Sundekuppam - 2 Village, Krishnagiri Taluk and District by considering the representation of the petitioner dated 17.11.2023.

¶26

2. It is the case of the petitioner that the subject property is belonged to

¶27

petitioner's father-in-law. After his demise, his legal heirs Ramasamy (son), Perumal (petitioner's husband) and Sangeetha (petitioner's sister-in-law) orally partitioned the properties left by him. In the said partition, property in S. No.270/1A measuring 20 cents was allotted to the share of petitioner's husband.

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ________

¶29

_______ Page 2/5_

¶30

W.P. No.18832 of 2024

¶31

Petitioner's husband Perumal passed away on 23.07.2017. Thereafter, one Mani, namely the 4th respondent, who is none other than her husband's paternal uncle, colluded with the revenue officials and other private respondents who own adjacent lands managed to get their names included in Patta No.230. In this regard, the petitioner has given a representation dated 17.11.2023 to remove the wrong entry. Hence she filed this writ petition.

¶32

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 and perused the materials available on record.

¶33

Considering the limited relief sought for in this writ petition, the respondents 1 to 3 are directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 17.11.2023, on merits and in accordance with law, after giving notice to respondents 4 to 7 or any other interested persons and dispose the same. Such exercise shall be completed within a period of two months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis _______ Page 3/5_

¶35

W.P. No.18832 of 2024

¶36

5. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

16.07.2024

Asr

1.The District Collector Krishnagiri - 635 001

¶41

2.The District Revenue Officer Krishnagiri District Krishnagiri - 635 001

¶42

3.The Tahsildar Krishnagiri Taluk Krishnagiri - 635 001

¶43

4.The Government Pleader, High Court, Madras

¶44

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis _______ Page 4/5_

¶45

W.P. No.18832 of 2024

¶46

N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.

¶47

Asr

¶48

W.P. No.18832 of 2024

¶49

16.07.2024

¶50

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis _______ Page 5/5_

Tamilarasi v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tamilarasi v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr. N.Ramamoorthy Vs Thiru. Thiruvarampillai

K.Natarajan Vs Thiru. Thiruvarampillai

S.Malika Vs the Additional Inspector of General

S.Rajam Vs D.Mohan IAS

Sathyanarayanan Vs The Sub Registrar

Masilamani Vs the District Revenue Officer