D. Sudhakaran, v. The Registrar
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court dismissed Writ Petition under Article 226 for non-prosecution as the petitioner did not appear for hearing. Connected miscellaneous petitions were also closed.
What did the court decide?
Writ Petition dismissed for non-prosecution; connected MPs closed.
What the court decided
W.P.No.36793 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 12.11.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN
W.P.No.36793 of 2015 and M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2015
D.Sudhakaran
Petitioner
versus
1.The Registrar, University of Madras, Kamarajar Salai, Chennai - 600 005.
2.The Deputy Director, District Employment Office, Santhome,
Chennai - 600 004. ... Respondents
Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the first respondent in his proceedings No.F1(A)/ESTT/2013/003 dated 02.01.2013 and quash the same and further directing the first respondent to appoint the petitioner in the post of Assistant in the first respondent's Institution.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
D.Sudhakaran
- respondent
The Registrar, University of Madras
- respondent
The Deputy Director, District Employment Office
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · G.arul Murugan
- Order 2 · Hemant Chandangoudar
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court