Dismissed

G.Mohan,S/o.a.Govindan, v. The Principal Secretary to

Madras HC5 Nov 2024WP/32692/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a non-speaking order disposing of a writ petition challenging a charge memo. The High Court held that as the disciplinary authority had dropped the charges via an order dated 29.06.2016, the petition challenging the memo had become infructuous and was dismissed.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition challenging the charge memo was dismissed as infructuous; all miscellaneous petitions were closed.

G.Mohan,S/o.a.Govindan, Vs The Principal Secretary to — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No.32692 of 2014

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 05.11.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN

¶6

W.P.No.32692 of 2014 and M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2014

G.Mohan

Petitioner

versus

1.The Principal Secretary to Government And Disciplinary Authority, Finance Department, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009.

¶11

2.The Principal Secretary to Government, Personal and Administrative Reforms (N) Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.

¶12

3.The Director, Local Fund Audit Department. Kuralagam, 4^th Floor, Chennai - 600 108.

¶13

Respondents

¶14

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the entire records of the first respondent in Government letter No.51350/2012-6 Finance (Local Fund Audit) Department dated 18.09.2014 and quash the same.

¶15

1/4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

W.P.No.32692 of 2014

¶18

For Petitioner : Mr.U.Karunakaran For Respondents : Mr.P.Ananda Kumar Government Advocate

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

The writ petition is filed challenging the charge memo issued by the first respondent dated 18.09.2014.

¶21

2 . Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents, by relying on the counter affidavit, submitted that pursuant to the report of the disciplinary authority, the first respondent had issued the Government Order in G.O.(Ms.)No.189, Finance (Local Fund) Department dated 29.06.2016 and decided to drop the charges framed against the petitioner.

¶22

4 . In view of the same, the relief sought for in the present writ petition challenging the charge memo has become infructuous. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous .

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

2/4

¶25

W.P.No.32692 of 2014

¶26

5 . There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected

¶27

Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

¶28

05.11.2024

¶29

Speaking order / Non-speaking order Index : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No

¶30

sri

¶31

¶32

1.The Principal Secretary to Government And Disciplinary Authority, Finance Department, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009.

¶33

2.The Principal Secretary to Government, Personal and Administrative Reforms (N) Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.

¶34

3.The Director, Local Fund Audit Department. Kuralagam, 4^th Floor, Chennai - 600 108.

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

3/4

¶37

W.P.No.32692 of 2014

¶38

G.ARUL MURUGAN, J.

¶39

sri

¶40

W.P.No.32692 of 2014 and M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2014

¶41

05.11.2024

¶42

4/4

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

G.Mohan,S/o.a.Govindan, v. The Principal Secretary to

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G.Mohan,S/o.a.Govindan, v. The Principal Secretary to

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Sridevi, Vs the Secretary to Government

K.Annamalai Vs the State of Tamilnadu

G.Rathinam, Vs the Joint Registrar of

K.Rajendran, Vs The State of Tamilnadu

G.Mari Vs The Government of Tamilnadu

S.Vaiyapuri Vs The Secretary to Government