Dismissed

V.Senthilkumar v. The Tamil Nadu Public Service

Madras HC5 Jun 2024WP/36610/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition challenging non-selection for counselling for TNPSC Group IV Services 2013-14 and 2014-15. Petitioner's counsel submitted the matter had become infructuous; the court dismissed the petition as infructuous with no costs and closed connected miscellaneous petitions.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; no costs; connected M.Ps. closed.

V.Senthilkumar Vs The Tamil Nadu Public Service — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No.36610 of 2015

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 05.06.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T.ASHA

¶6

W.P.No.36610 of 2015 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2015

V.Senthilkumar

... Petitioner

-Vs-

The Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, represented by its Secretary, V.O.C.Nagar, Park Town, Chennai – 600 003. Respondent

¶11

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to List of Candidates dated 28.10.2015 Selected for Counselling for the years 2013-14 and 2014-15, declare the non-selection of the petitioner for counselling as illegal and quash the same and to issue direction to the respondent to permit the petitioner to attend the counselling and other process of Selection on the basis of the petitioner performance; to consider the petitioner candidature (Register No.170223265) for selection and

¶12

Page 1 of 4

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

W.P.No.36610 of 2015

¶15

appointment for Group IV Services for 2013-14 and 2014-15.

¶16

For petitioner : Mr.M.Ravi For respondent : Mrs.G.Hema

¶17

O RDER

¶18

This writ petition has been filed to call for the records relating to List of Candidates dated 28.10.2015 Selected for Counselling for the years 2013-14 and 2014-15, declare the nonselection of the petitioner for counselling as illegal and quash the same and to issue direction to the respondent to permit the petitioner to attend the counselling and other process of Selection on the basis of the petitioner performance; to consider the petitioner candidature (Register No.170223265) for selection and appointment for Group IV Services for 2013-14 and 2014-15.

¶19

On the last occasion, when the matter was taken up for

¶20

hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter has become infructuous.

¶21

Page 2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

W.P.No.36610 of 2015

¶23

In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Connected M.Ps. stand closed.

¶24

05.06.2024

¶25

Internet : Yes Index : Yes/No Speaking order/Non-speaking order ssa

¶26

¶27

Secretary The Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, V.O.C.Nagar, Park Town, Chennai – 600 003.

¶28

Page 3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.36610 of 2015

P.T.ASHA, J.,

ssa

W.P.No.36610 of 2015

¶33

05.06.2024

¶34

Page 4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

V.Senthilkumar v. The Tamil Nadu Public Service

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V.Senthilkumar v. The Tamil Nadu Public Service

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr.R.Murugasan Vs Government of Tamilnadu

M.Muthukrishnan Vs The Union of India

T. Thangamani, Vs The Joint Registrar of

R.Sanjai, Vs Secretary

G.T.Selvakuar Vs Government of Tamilnadu

B.Rajaram, Vs The Joint Registrar of