Disposed

G.T.Selvakuar v. Government of Tamilnadu

Madras HC5 Jun 2024WP/30376/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court disposed of the writ petitions seeking pay fixation and quashing of an order, following a prior batch judgment. Liberty was granted to approach competent authorities for pay enhancement if juniors receive higher pay, with no recovery from pensioners.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to approach competent authority for pay enhancement; no recovery from pension permitted.

G.T.Selvakuar Vs Government of Tamilnadu — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.Nos.30376 and 30377 of 2014

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 05.06.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE P.T.ASHA

¶6

W.P.Nos.30376 and 30377 of 2014 and M.P.Nos.1 and of 2014

¶7

G.T.Selvakumar ... Petitioner in W.P.No.30376 of 2014 G.Vasanthi Regina ....Petitioner in W.P.No.30377 of 2014

¶8

Vs.

¶9

1.Govt. of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by the Secretary, Higher Education(G2 Department), Secretariat, Chennai-9.

¶10

2.The Director of Collegiate Education, College Road, Chennai-6.

¶11

The Joint Director of Collegiate Education, Trichy Region,Tiruchirapalli-620 020.

¶12

The Secretary, TBML College, Porayar, Nagapattinam-609 307. ... Respondents in both W.Ps

¶13

PRAYER in both W.Ps: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of

¶14

1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

W.P.Nos.30376 and 30377 of 2014

¶16

the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to ADM No.330/E4/2012 dated 27.07.2012 issued by the 3^rd respondent and quash the same and direct the 3^rd respondent to fix the petitioner scale of pay at Rs.9300-34,800 + grade pay Rs.4400/- as per the revised fixation statement in Appendix IV submitted by the 4^th respondent.

¶17

For Petitioner : M/s.R.Subramanian in both W.Ps For Respondents : Mr.D.Ravichander [R1 to R3] in both W.Ps Special Government Pleader For 4^th Respondent: Served - No Appearance

¶18

COMMON ORDER

¶19

In the light of the order of the Madurai Bench of this Court

¶20

passed in the batch of writ petitions in W.P.(MD).No.16379 of of 2014 etc., dated 08.12.2020 similar to the issue involved in these

¶21

writ petitions, they are disposed on the same lines granting the liberty as provided in paragraphs 17 and 19 of the earlier order which reads as follows:

¶22

“17.Thus, any of the petitioners are

¶23

2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

W.P.Nos.30376 and 30377 of 2014

¶25

aggrieved on account of the fact that their juniors

¶26

are getting more pay, then they are liberty to approach the competent authority for the purpose

¶27

of enhancement of their pay on par with their juniors.

¶28

19. It is made clear that if any of the

¶29

petitioners are already retired from service and is a

¶30

pensioner, then, recovery cannot be imposed from

¶31

their pension or pensionary benefits.”.

¶32

There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

05.06.2024

srn

The Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Higher Education(G2 Department), Secretariat, Chennai-9.2.The Director of Collegiate Education, College Road, Chennai-6.

¶37

The Joint Director of Collegiate Education,

¶38

3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶39

W.P.Nos.30376 and 30377 of 2014

¶40

Trichy Region,Tiruchirapalli-620 020.

¶41

The Secretary, TBML College, Porayar, Nagapattinam-609 307.

¶42

4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶43

W.P.Nos.30376 and 30377 of 2014

¶44

P.T.ASHA, J.,

¶45

srn

¶46

W.P.Nos.30376 and 30377 of 2014 and M.P.Nos.1 and 1 of 2014

¶47

05.06.2024

¶48

5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

G.T.Selvakuar v. Government of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G.T.Selvakuar v. Government of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr.R.Murugasan Vs Government of Tamilnadu

M.Muthukrishnan Vs The Union of India

T. Thangamani, Vs The Joint Registrar of

R.Sanjai, Vs Secretary

V.Senthilkumar Vs The Tamil Nadu Public Service

B.Rajaram, Vs The Joint Registrar of