Petitioner withdrew the writ petition challenging a notice under Section 6 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905, subject to preservation of contentions. The court disposed of the petition as closed/withdrawn with no order as to costs.
Writ petition disposed of as closed/withdrawn with preservation of rights and contentions; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.36521 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 09.12.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR
and
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR
W.P.No.36521 of 2024 and
W.M.P.No.39372 of 2024
N.Chitra
... Petitioner
vs
2.The Tahsildar, Palladam Taluk, Tiruppur District.
3.The Revenue Inspector, Palladam Taluk, Tiruppur District.
4.C.Ponnuswamy
5.P.Mallika
... Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India, 1950 praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to impugned notice dated 04.10.2024, issued by the 2nd respondent, under
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page Nos.1/4
W.P.No.36521 of 2024
Section 6 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905, in respect of Survey No.282/6, situated at Ganapathipalayam Revenue Village, Malaiyampalayam, Ganapathipalayam Village, Palladam Taluk, Tiruppur District.
For Petitioner : Mr.C.Prabakaran
ORDER
[Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR, J .,]
In the captioned matter, a notice under Section 6 of 'the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 (Tamil Nadu Act III of 1905)' [hereinafter
'said 1905 Act' for the sake of brevity, convenience and clarity] has been assailed.
2.When the matter was taken up, Mr.C.Prabakaran, learned counsel for writ petitioner sought leave of this Court to withdraw captioned 'Writ Petition' ['WP' for the sake of brevity] but made a plea to preserve all the rights and contentions of the writ petitioner and more particularly, preserve the contentions of the writ petitioner vide response dated 07.10.2024, saying so, learned counsel has made an endorsement in the case file and a scanned reproduction of the same is as follows:
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page Nos.2/4
W.P.No.36521 of 2024
closed/withdrawn albeit with preservation of rights and contentions in the aforesaid manner. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Index : Yes / No Speaking order / Non-speaking order Neutral Citation : Yes / No rsi
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page Nos.3/4
W.P.No.36521 of 2024
M.SUNDAR, J., and K.RAJASEKAR, J.,
rsi
To
W.P.No.36521 of 2024 and
W.M.P.No.39372 of 2024
09.12.2024 (2/2)
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page Nos.4/4
2 provisions across 2 enactments
N.Chitra
The District Collector, Tiruppur District
The Tahsildar, Palladam Taluk
The Revenue Inspector, Palladam Taluk
C.Ponnuswamy
P.Mallika
M.SUNDAR
K.RAJASEKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
