The court disposed of a writ petition seeking quashing of an impugned order. Counsel requested withdrawal while preserving rights for civil court, which was acceded to.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.35826 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 05.12.2024
Coram
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR
and
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR
W.P.No.35826 of 2024
&
W.M.P Nos.38686 and 38692 of 2024
in
W.P.No.35826 of 2024
Mr.G.Kumar
S/o.P.V.Gangatharan
.. Petitioner
vs
Chennai
O/o. The Revenue Divisional Office Guindy Taluk
Chennai – 600 032
Page 1 of 6
W.P.No.35826 of 2024
Guindy Taluk Chennai – 600 032
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order in Na.Ka.No.A1/471/2024 dated 30.07.2024 passed by the third respondent and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the 6th respondent to not to interfere with the peaceful possession of petitioner property located at New Door No.13, S.No.49/2, T.S.No.12 and Block No.18, Kottur, Ellaiammankovil Street, Guindy Taluk, Chennai – 600 085.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Prabhakaran
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 2 of 6
W.P.No.35826 of 2024
O R D E R
(Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR, J.)
When the matter was taken up, after some arguments,
Mr.R.Prabhakaran, learned counsel on record for writ petitioner sought
leave of this Court to withdraw the captioned writ petition but learned
counsel made a plea that all the rights and contentions of the writ
petitioner may please be preserved when the parties to go to Civil Court.
Saying so, learned counsel has made an endorsement in the case file and
a scanned reproduction of the same is as follows:
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 3 of 6
W.P.No.35826 of 2024
2. Request of learned counsel to withdraw and request to preserve
the rights of the parties to go to civil Court also acceded to.
3. Ergo, the sequitur is, captioned writ petition and writ
miscellaneous petitions are disposed of as closed/withdrawn albeit preserving all the rights and contentions of the writ petitioner as well as the adversaries, State and all parties concerned when the matter goes to
civil Court. Considering the nature of the submissions made and the stand taken by learned counsel for writ petitioner we refrain from
imposing costs.
[M.S., J] [K.R.S., J] 05.12.2024 gpa (½)
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 4 of 6
W.P.No.35826 of 2024
To
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 5 of 6
W.P.No.35826 of 2024
M.SUNDAR,J., and K.RAJASEKAR, J.,
gpa
W.P.No.35826 of 2024
05.12.2024 (½)
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 6 of 6
G.Kumar
The District Collector
The Revenue Divisional Officers
The Tahsildar
The Survey Officer
The Inspector of Police
M.SUNDAR
K.RAJASEKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
