petitioner has been working as such. The petitioner made several representations to the respondents, requesting to regularize his service. But his representations were not considered. While so, the Government has issued G.O.No.22, Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department dated 28.02.2006, extending the benefit of regularization of services of the persons who worked on a consolidated pay for more than 10 years as on 01.01.2006. Based on the said Government Order, the second respondent sent a proposal to the first respondent vide proceedings dated 27.08.2009 to regularize the service of the petitioner. However, no order was passed on the proposal sent by the second respondent. Hence, the petitioner filed a Writ Petition in WP.No.446 of 2015, seeking a Writ of Mandamus to the respondents therein, to consider his representation dated 28.10.2014, to regularise his service. The said Writ Petition was disposed of by this Court on 21.09.2017, directing the second respondent herein/ the District Collector to consider his representation dated 28.04.2014 and pass orders on merit and in accordance with law. Thereafter, the second respondent/District Collector has passed the impugned order dated 28.10.2018, rejecting the representation made by the petitioner without any valid reasons. Challenging the same, the petitioner has constrained to file
