Disposed

G.Babu v. the District Collector

Madras HC19 Nov 2024WP/33832/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single bench of the Madras High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging temple encroachment on public land. The court issued notice to official respondents and directed reference to the Divisional Monitoring Committee to examine the claim after giving opportunity to alleged encroachers.

What did the court decide?

Notice issued to respondents 1 to 5 and matter referred to Divisional Monitoring Committee for examination of alleged encroachment after giving opportunity to encroachers.

G.Babu Vs the District Collector — Municipal and Town Planning | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No.33832 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 19.11.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR

¶6

W.P.No.33832 of 2024

¶7

Mr.G.Babu S/o.P.Govindharaj

¶8

... Petitioner

¶9

Vs.

¶10

The District Collector Chennai District No.62, 4^th Floor, Rajaji Salai Beach Road, George Town Chennai – 600 001

¶11

The Commissioner

¶12

Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department No.119, Mahatma Gandhi Salai Thousand Lights, Nungambakkam Chennai – 600 034

¶13

The Chief Minister Cell Special Department Secretariat Chennai – 600 009

¶14

The Corporation Commissioner Greater Chennai Corporation Ribbon Building, Perimet

¶15

Page Nos.1/9

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

¶18

Chennai – 600 003

¶19

The Executive Engineer Greater Chennai Corporation Zone-4, No.226 Tondiarpet High Road Chennai – 600 021

¶20

W.P.No.33832 of 2024

¶21

Mr.Raju 7. Mrs.Jaya ... Respondents

¶22

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing respondents 1 to 5 to consider the representations of the petitioner dated 16.09.2024 and 25.09.2024 and direct the respondents 1 to 5 to remove the temple run by the 6^th and 7^th respondents by occupying the public road illegally and unauthorizedly by fixing a stipulated time.

¶23

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Balasubramani

¶24

For Respondents : Mr.M.S.Arasakumar Government Advocate for R1 & R3

¶25

Mr.N.R.R.Arun Natarajan Spl. Govt. Pleader (HR & CE) for R2

¶26

Mr.A.C.Mani Bharathi for R4 and R5

¶27

Page Nos.2/9

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

W.P.No.33832 of 2024

¶30

O R D E R

¶31

[Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR, J. ,]

¶32

This order will now dispose of the captioned 'Writ Petition' ['WP' for

¶33

the sake of brevity].

¶34

Mr.V.Balasubramani, learned counsel on record for writ petitioner

¶35

is before us.

¶36

Adverting to representations from the writ petitioner dated 16.09.2024 and 25.09.2024, learned counsel for writ petitioner submitted that there is alleged encroachment in 'public road in Block No.3, Koyyathoppu, 3^rd Street, Kodungaiyur, Chennai – 600 118' [hereinafter 'said public road' for the sake of convenience and clarity] by R6 and R7 before us. To be noted, R6 and R7 are private respondents.

¶37

Considering the obtaining position, we are of the view that the captioned WP can be disposed of by ordering notice to respondents (R1 to R5) and putting in a safety valve / adequate protection qua alleged encroachers i.e., R6 & R7.

¶38

Page Nos.3/9

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶40

W.P.No.33832 of 2024

¶41

Issue notice to official respondents i.e., R1 to R5.

¶42

Mr.M.S.Arasa Kumar, learned Government Advocate accepts notice for R1 and R3, Mr.N.R.R.Arun Natarajan, learned Special Government Pleader (HR & CE) accepts notice for R2 and Mr.A.C.Mani Bharathi, learned counsel accepts notice for R4 and R5.

¶43

In the light of what has been alluded to supra and considering the

¶44

limited scope of the captioned WP, with the consent of both sides, main WP was taken up.

¶45

It was submitted by learned State counsel that G.O.(Ms)No.64, Revenue and Disaster Management Department, Land Disposal Wing, dated 08.02.2022 has been put in place, wherein and whereby Divisional Monitoring committee, District Monitoring Committee and State Steering Committee have been constituted inter alia for a single point reporting / monitoring system qua Government lands.

¶46

Page Nos.4/9

¶47

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶48

W.P.No.33832 of 2024

¶49

In the light of the narrative thus far, we deem it appropriate to refer

¶50

the matter to the Divisional Monitoring Committee headed by Revenue Divisional Officer, Chennai Central, in the light of G.O.(Ms)No.64, Revenue and Disaster Management Department, Land Disposal Wing, dated 08.02.2022.

¶51

This Court directs the jurisdictional Divisional Monitoring Committee to examine if there is encroachment qua said land. The Divisional Monitoring Committee shall also ensure that adequate and ample opportunity is given to persons concerned more particularly alleged encroachers (R6 & R7) before taking a call. In this regard, we are acutely conscious that the matter is being disposed of in Admission Board without notice to alleged encroachers and therefore, this safety valve is put in place. To be noted, all the rights and contentions of alleged encroachers are preserved for being raised before the Committee concerned which shall consider the same on its own merits and in accordance with law untrammelled by this proceedings in this Court.

¶52

Page Nos.5/9

¶53

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶54

W.P.No.33832 of 2024

¶55

The Divisional Monitoring Committee qua G.O.(Ms)No.64, Revenue and Disaster Management Department, Land Disposal Wing, dated 08.02.2022, shall (if it comes to the conclusion that there is encroachment) report the encroachment for further action (for removal of encroachment which again shall be after giving adequate and ample opportunity to alleged encroachers).

¶56

It is open to the WP petitioner and or anyone concerned with this

¶57

matter to come to this Court on the same issue even with a similar / same

¶58

prayer if there are any change of circumstances.

¶59

We make it clear that we have not expressed any view or opinion as to whether there is encroachment or not qua said land as it turns on facts and it is for the Divisional Monitoring Committee to take a call on this aspect of the matter. We also make it clear that this exercise will not apply to patta land and it will apply only to public land, if there is any encroachment in public land.

¶60

Page Nos.6/9

¶61

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶62

W.P.No.33832 of 2024

¶63

Captioned WP is disposed of with the aforementioned

¶64

observations and directives in the aforesaid manner. There shall be no order

¶65

as to costs.

¶66

(M.S.,J.) (K.R.S.,J.) 19.11.2024

¶67

Index : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No gpa

¶68

Page Nos.7/9

¶69

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶70

W.P.No.33832 of 2024

¶71

¶72

The District Collector Chennai District No.62, 4^th Floor, Rajaji Salai Beach Road, George Town Chennai – 600 001

¶73

The Commissioner Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department No.119, Mahatma Gandhi Salai Thousand Lights, Nungambakkam Chennai – 600 034

¶74

The Chief Minister Cell Special Department Secretariat Chennai – 600 009

¶75

The Corporation Commissioner Greater Chennai Corporation Ribbon Building, Perimet Chennai – 600 003

¶76

The Executive Engineer Greater Chennai Corporation Zone-4, No.226 Tondiarpet High Road Chennai – 600 021

¶77

The Revenue Divisional Officer Chennai Central,

¶78

Page Nos.8/9

¶79

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶80

W.P.No.33832 of 2024

¶81

M.SUNDAR, J., and K.RAJASEKAR, J.,

¶82

gpa

¶83

W.P.No.33832 of 2024

¶84

19.11.2024

¶85

Page Nos.9/9

¶86

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

G.Babu v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G.Babu v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

B.Prabhakaran Vs The Commissioner

B.Prabhakaran Vs The Commissioner

Rajmohan Vs The President

Regina Selvam Vs the Secretary to Government

Regina Selvam Vs the Secretary to Government

Praveen Kumar Vs the District Collector