Disposed

M.Nalini v. the Director of School Education

Madras HC12 Nov 2024WP/33474/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition sought correction of the petitioner's date of birth in Class 10, 11, 12 mark statements and transfer certificate via consideration of a representation dated 25.04.2024. The court, without going into merits, directed respondents to consider the representation and take appropriate action in accordance with law within two weeks.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed to consider the representation dated 25.04.2024 and take appropriate action in accordance with law within two weeks.

M.Nalini Vs the Director of School Education — Education and Admissions | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No.33474 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 12.11.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH

¶6

W.P.No.33474 of 2024

M.Nalini

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Director of School Education, DMS Campus, College Road, Chennai

¶11

The Headmaster, Anjugam Higher Secondary School (Govt. Aided), West Mambalam, Chenai – 600 033 ... Respondents

¶12

Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first and second respondents to consider the representations dated 25.04.2024 and take appropriate action immediately in accordance with law to correct date of birth in the 10^th , 11^th , 12^th Mark statements and Transfer Certificate.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Gopinath

¶14

For Respondents : Ms.Akila Rajendran, Government Advocate

¶15

Page 1 of 4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

W.P.No.33474 of 2024

¶18

O R D E R

¶19

This Writ Petition has been filed for directing the first and second respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 25.04.2024

¶20

and to take appropriate action immediately to correct the date of birth of the petitioner in the 10^th , 11^th , 12^th Mark Statements and Transfer Certificate.

¶21

Heard both sides. With the consent of both sides, this Writ Petition is

¶22

disposed of at the admission stage itself.

¶23

This Court, without going into the merits of the present petition,

¶24

directs the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 25.04.2024 and shall take appropriate action in accordance with law, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶25

With the above direction, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No

costs.

12.11.2024

mac

Index : Yes / No Speaking order / Non-speaking order

¶30

Page 2 of 4

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

W.P.No.33474 of 2024

¶33

¶34

1.The Director of School Education, DMS Campus, College Road, Chennai

¶35

The Headmaster, Anjugam Higher Secondary School (Govt. Aided), West Mambalam, Chenai – 600 033

¶36

Page 3 of 4

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

W.P.No.33474 of 2024

¶39

VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J.

¶40

mac

¶41

W.P.No.33474 of 2024

¶42

12.11.2024

¶43

Page 4 of 4

¶44

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

M.Nalini v. the Director of School Education

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Nalini v. the Director of School Education

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Rajeshkumar Vs The Additional Chief Secretary to Government

S.Rajasekar Vs The Regional Manager ( P and Ir)

Mam Educational Trust Vs the Director of Private Schools

M.S.Subramanian Vs The Joint Director of Agriculture

M.Senthil Nathan Vs The Commissioner of Police

Dr.T.Deivasigamani Vs The Registrar