A writ petition by the Union of India challenging a Central Administrative Tribunal order was dismissed as covered by an earlier Division Bench decision in the Ramasamy case, with both sides concurring.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:MHC:3071
W.P.No.32936 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 09.08.2024
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. ARUL MURUGAN
W.P.No.32936 of 2018 and W.M.P.No.38172 of 2018
Union of India Rep. By its Senior Superintendent of Post Offices, Erode Division, Erode – 638 001.
.. Petitioner
vs
1.The Central Administrative Tribunal, Rep. By its Registrar, Madras Bench, Chennai – 104.
2.T.M.Somasundaram .. Respondents
Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of certiorari calling for the records dated 12.07.2016 and made in O.A.No.585/13 on the file of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chennai Bench and to quash the same in so far it is against the petitioners and render justice.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.S.Jeyaganeshan SPC For Respondents : R1 – Tribunal Mr.R.Malaichamy for R2
1/2
W.P.No.32936 of 2018
DR. ANITA SUMANTH,J. and G. ARUL MURUGAN.,J
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by Dr.ANITA SUMANTH.,J)
Both Mr.K.S.Jeyaganeshan, learned Senior Panel Counsel, appearing for petitioner and Mr.R.Malaichamy, learned counsel appearing for R2 would submit that the issue raised in this writ petition is covered by a decision of the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Union of India, Rep. By its Chief Postmaster General, Tamil Nadu Circle, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002 and others vs C.Ramasamy and anr [W.P.Nos.4971 to 4975 & 20488 of 2018 dated 18.03.2022].
[A.S.M., J] [G.A.M., J] 09.08.2024
Index:Yes/No Neutral Citation:Yes ssm
To
The Registrar, The Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench, Chennai – 104.
W.P.No.32936 of 2018
2/2
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
W.P.Nos.4971 to 4975 & 20488 of 2018 dated 18.03.2022
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Union of India Rep. By its Senior Superintendent of Post Offices, Erode Division, Erode – 638 001
The Central Administrative Tribunal, Rep. By its Registrar, Madras Bench, Chennai – 104
T.M.Somasundaram
Anita Sumanth
G. Arul Murugan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
