The State of Tamilnadu v. G.Mani
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court, relying on the Full Bench decision in State of Tamil Nadu v. R.Kaliyamoorthy, held that regularization after 01.04.2003 does not allow counting past service for pension. As the authorities had already rejected the claim and it remained unchallenged, the appeal was closed without passing further orders.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.A.No.3416 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 09.08.2024
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. ARUL MURUGAN
W.A.No.3416 of 2019 and
C.M.P.No.21968 of 2019
- 1.The State of Tamil Nadu
Rep. By its Secretary to Government Labour and Employment (E2) Department,
Secretariat, Chennai – 9.
2.The Commissioner of Labour,
Chennai – 600 006.
.. Appellant
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ appeal lies when the Full Bench decision covers the issue and the rejection order is unchallenged?
Whether the claim for counting past service for family pension is valid post Full Bench ruling?
Parties & counsel
- appellant
The State of Tamil Nadu
- appellant
The Commissioner of Labour
- respondent
Tmt.G.Mani
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court