Disposed

K.Munusamy v. the District Collector

Madras HC30 Oct 2024WP/32865/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition seeking directions to consider representations pending before the District Collector. Court directed the second respondent to consider the representations after hearing and pass orders within four weeks; third respondent directed to maintain status quo.

What did the court decide?

Directions to consider representations within four weeks with hearing; status quo maintained meanwhile.

K.Munusamy Vs the District Collector — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No.32865 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 30.10.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶6

W.P.No.32865 of 2024 and WMP.No.35690 of 2024

¶7

K.Munusamy ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Salem 2.The Commissioner, Office of the Corporation, Salem 3.The Assistant Commissioner, Office of the Corporation, Hasthampatti Zone, Salem ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India p raying to issue Writ of Mandamus to consider the petitioner's representation dated 18.10.2024 and 29.10.2024 within the time limit

¶8

fixed by this Court pending before the first respondent.

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr.R.K.Arjun Raj For Respondents For R1 : Mr.C.Kathiravan, Special Government Pleader

¶10

1/4

¶11

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶12

W.P.No.32865 of 2024

¶13

ORDER

¶14

This writ petition has been filed for direction t o consider the

¶15

petitioner's representations dated 18.10.2024 and 29.10.2024 pending before the first respondent within the time limit fixed by this Court.

¶16

Without expressing any opinion on merits of the writ petition, the second respondent is directed to the consider the p etitioner's representations dated 18.10.2024 and 29.10.2024 and, after giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, to pass appropriate orders within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Till then, the third respondent is directed to maintain ' status quo '.

¶17

With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of.

¶18

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶19

30.10.2024

¶20

Neutral citation: Yes/No Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order lok

¶21

2/4

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

W.P.No.32865 of 2024

¶24

¶25

1.The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Salem

¶26

2.The Commissioner, Office of the Corporation, Salem

¶27

3.The Assistant Commissioner, Office of the Corporation, Hasthampatti Zone, Salem

¶28

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

¶29

3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.32865 of 2024

lok

W.P.No.32865 of 2024

30.10.2024

4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

K.Munusamy v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Munusamy v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Rajeshwari Vs The Member secretary

A.B.Ubaidullah, Vs The Secretary to Government

Karupayal Vs The Regional Transport Officer

Riyaz Mohammed Vs Eka Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. Rep by its Director Jayakannan Perumal Swamy

M/s Tata Capital Limited Vs Prathap P N

S.Jayakumar Vs the President