Arbitration application seeking repossession of a vehicle by an Advocate Commissioner was closed as the vehicle could not be located despite earlier orders and time extensions.
Application closed; liberty to file fresh application for Advocate Commissioner appointment once the vehicle is located.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
Arb Appln NO. 773 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06-03-2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Arb Appln No. 773 of 2024
M/s Tata Capital Limited 11th Floor Tower A Peninsula Business Park Ganpatrao Kadam Marg Lower Parel Mumbai 400013
Applicant(s)
Vs
Prathap P N
S/o.Narayanappa N Annayappa, Compound, 4th Cross Bilekahalli, Layout, B G Road, Doddpatalamma, Temple, Bangalore,karnataka 560 076.11th Floor Tower A Peninsula Business Park Ganpatrao Kadam Marg Lower Parel Mumbai 400013 and another ....Respondent(s)
For Applicant(s): Mr..M.Arunachalam Mr.M.Ragul Kousik: Advocate Commissioner
ORDER
This Court, by its order dated 30.10.2024, appointed an Advocate
Commissioner to repossess the vehicle from the respondent or wherever available. Till date, the Advocate Commissioner appointed by this Court is unable to repossess the vehicle. This Court had already granted extension of time on 12.12.2024 & 23.01.2025 to comply with the earlier order dated
30.10.2024.
1/2
2
ABDUL QUDDHOSE,J.
06.03.2025
vsi To
Sai Splendar Apartment No 106 3rd cross Avani Shringeri Nagar,Rukhmaiah Layout Hulimavu Krishna Kuteera Hotel Bangalore Karnataka 560076
Arb Appln No. 773 of 2024
2/2
M/s Tata Capital Limited
Prathap P N
Samson D
Abdul Quddhose
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
