Disposed

R.Yuvaraj v. The Secretary

Madras HC15 Feb 2024WP/26230/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Madras disposed a writ petition filed by retired Headmasters seeking pension revision under G.O.Ms.No.210/2009, reading it in the light of a prior Writ Appeal. The court directed respondents to consider representations and pass individual orders within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondents to consider representations regarding pension benefits and pass individual orders within six weeks of receiving a copy of the order.

R.Yuvaraj Vs The Secretary — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No.26230/2021

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 15.02.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE Ms.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA

¶6

W.P. No.26230 of 2021

¶7

R.Yuvaraj 2. M.Rajan 3. K.Devarajan 4. K.Govindan 5. N.Rajalakshmi ... Petitioners /vs/

¶8

The Secretary, School Education Department, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.

¶9

The Director of School Education, D.P.I.College Road, Chennai – 600 006.

¶10

The District Educational Officer, Krishnagiri Town, Krishnagiri.

¶11

The District Educational Officer (North), Madurai, Madurai District.

¶12

The Block Educational Officer, Kaveripattinam Block, Krishnagiri District. ... Respondents

¶13

Page 1 of 4

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

W.P.No.26230/2021

¶16

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India

¶17

to issue a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to extend the benefits

¶18

of G.O.Ms.No.210, School Education (G1) Department, dated 14.08.2009 in the light of the Divisional Bench of this Court in W.A.No.73/2019 dated 26.03.2019 and pay all revised pension and other arrears.

¶19

For Petitioner ... Mr.R.Sreedharan

¶20

For Respondents ... Mr.P.Gurunathan Additional Govt. Pleader R1 to R4

¶21

Mr.S.Arumugam for R5

¶22

ORDER

¶23

The petitioner has filed this writ petition for the issuance of writ of

¶24

mandamus to direct the respondents to extend the benefits of G.O.Ms.No.210, School Education (G1) Department, dated 14.08.2009 in

¶25

the light of the Divisional Bench of this Court in W.A.No.73/2019 dated 26.03.2019 and pay all revised pension and other arrears.

¶26

The petitioners are the retired Middle School Headmasters and

¶27

they have filed this petition seeking the benefits of G.O.Ms.No.210,

¶28

School Education (G1) Department, dated 14.08.2009.

¶29

Page 2 of 4

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

W.P.No.26230/2021

¶32

Mr.P.Gurunathan, the learned Additional Government Pleader,

¶33

submitted that some of the petitioners themselves have relinquished the post of Headmasters and now they cannot come and claim the benefits of G.O.Ms.No.210, School Education (G1) Department, dated 14.08.2009.

¶34

Considering the limited prayer sought in this writ petition, the respondents are directed to consider the representation of the petitioners dated 14.08.2009 and pass individual orders on its own merits and in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶35

With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed. No costs.

¶36

15.02.2024

¶37

Index: Yes / No Speaking order / Non-speaking order bkn

¶38

Page 3 of 4

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.26230/2021

R.N.MANJULA ,J.

bkn

To:

The Secretary, School Education Department, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.

¶45

The Director of School Education, D.P.I.College Road, Chennai – 600 006.

¶46

The District Educational Officer, Krishnagiri Town, Krishnagiri.

¶47

The District Educational Officer (North), Madurai, Madurai District.

¶48

The Block Educational Officer, Kaveripattinam Block, Krishnagiri District.

¶49

W.P. No.26230 of 2021

¶50

15.02.2024

¶51

Page 4 of 4

¶52

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

R.Yuvaraj v. The Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Yuvaraj v. The Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Monikandan Vs The Deputy Inspector Genreal of Police

E.Jayaraj Vs The State of Tamil Nadu rep. by its

C.Amutha valli Vs The Joint commissioner (St) (Fac)

D.Ramamoorthy Vs Principal Secretary to Government

Indirani (Deceased) Vs The District Collector of Vellore

G.Anburaj Vs The Principal Secretary to the State Government