Melvisharam Muslim v. the Tamilnadu Wakf Board
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court, in Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution regarding claims of being private wakfs outside the Wakf Act's purview, did not adjudicate the merits. Instead, it directed petitioners to raise objections before the first respondent within two weeks and处事 orders were issued. The writ petitions were disposed of with no costs awarded following this direction.
What did the court decide?
Directing petitioners to make objections before the 1st respondent within two weeks; the 1st respondent to consider them after enquiry within twelve weeks. No costs.