Disposed

A.Ayyandurai v. the Thasildhar

Madras HC3 Sept 2024WP/25431/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras disposed the writ petition as an interlocutory order. The Court directed the Respondent Tahsildar to consider the petitioner's pending online application for transfer of patta and pass final orders within six weeks without adjudicating on the merits of the claim.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the respondent to consider the pending online application No.2023/0105/08/393264 and pass final orders within six weeks.

A.Ayyandurai Vs the Thasildhar — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No.25431 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 03.09.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR

¶6

W.P.No.25431 of 2024

N.Ayyandurai

... Petitioner

vs.

The Tahsildar Omalur Taluk Salem. ... Respondent

¶11

PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondent to consider the Petitioner Application No.2023/0105/08/393264, dated 16.05.2023 and consequently direct the Respondent to issue Sub Division Patta.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Venkadesh Kumar

¶13

For Respondent : Mr.U.Baranidaran Additional Government Pleader

¶14

O R D E R

¶15

The petitioner herein seeks a direction to the respondent to consider

¶16

his Online Application No.2023/0105/08/393264, dated 16.05.2023 for

¶17

transfer of patta.

¶18

1/4

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

W.P.No.25431 of 2024

¶21

According to the petitioner, his father purchased the property

¶22

comprised in Survey No.18/9 with an extent of 1.13 cents situated at Tharamangalam Municipality, Omalur Taluk, Salem District under a registered Sale Deed dated 23.04.1996 and he died on 25.11.2010 leaving behind petitioner and other legal heirs. Therefore, the petitioner submitted an online application on 16.05.2023 in Application No.2023/0105/08/393264 seeking transfer of patta in the name of his legal heirs. The same has not been considered by the respondent. Therefore, the petitioner is before this Court.

¶23

Mr.U.Baranidaran, learned Additional Government Pleader, who is taking notice for the respondent would submit that the online application of the petitioner dated 16.05.2023 will be considered by the respondent on its own merit within the time fixed by this Court.

¶24

In view of the same, without going into the merits of the claim made by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to direct the r espondent to consider the online application of the petitioner dated 16.05.2023 in Application No.2023/0105/08/393264 and pass f inal orders on its own merit,

¶25

2/4

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

W.P.No.25431 of 2024

¶28

within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶29

With the above direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. No

¶30

costs.

¶31

03.09.2024

¶32

Index : Yes/No Speaking order:Yes/No Neutral Citation:Yes/No dm To The Tahsildar Omalur Taluk Salem.

¶33

3/4

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.25431 of 2024

S.SOUNTHAR, J.

W.P.No.25431 of 2024

¶39

03.09.2024

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶41

4/4

A.Ayyandurai v. the Thasildhar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.Ayyandurai v. the Thasildhar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Bharathkumar Vs Mr.a.Ilangovane

Mrs.Muniyammal Vs the Arbitrator Cum District Collector

Jeyalakshmi Vs Joint Sub Registrar NO.1 (District Registrar Cadre)

S.Vasantha Vs Sub- Registrar

S.Sivaraj Vs the District Collector

Elavarasan S Vs the District Collector