Petitioner filed writ petition challenging online rejection of patta transfer request. Court held detailed order was produced; petitioner should challenge Tahsildar's order via appellate authority. Petition dismissed with liberty to appeal.
Petitioner directed to approach appellate authority; respondents to communicate order within two weeks. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.24038 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 03.09.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR
W.P.No.24038 of 2024 and WMP.No.26299 of 2024
S.Elavarasan
... Petitioner
vs.
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Salem District.
3.The Tahsildar, Pethanaickenpalayam Temple, Salem District.
... Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the file of the 3 rd respondent in proceedings Application No.2023/0105/08/408863, dated 26.09.2023 and quash the same as illegal, incompetent and without jurisdiction and further direct the 3 rd respondent to sub division and to transfer the patta in name of the petitioner as per registered Gift deed in document Number 2974 of 2023, dated 03.07.2023.
1/4
W.P.No.24038 of 2024
For Petitioner : Mr.A.Arunkumar For Respondents : Mr.P.Sathish Additional Government Pleader
O R D E R
Challenging the entry available in online portal that petitioner's request for transfer of patta was rejected, the petitioner has come by way of this writ petition.
the copy of the detailed order passed by the Tahsildar. Since the detailed order passed by the 3rd respondent is produced before this Court, it is for the petitioner to challenge the same before the appellate authority, namely the second respondent, in the manner known to law.
2/4
W.P.No.24038 of 2024
03.09.2024
Index : Yes/No Speaking order:Yes/No Neutral Citation:Yes/No ub To 1. The District Collector, Salem District. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Salem District. 3.The Tahsildar, Pethanaickenpalayam Temple, Salem District.
3/4
W.P.No.24038 of 2024
S.SOUNTHAR, J.
ub
W.P.No.24038 of 2024
03.09.2024
4/4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the online rejection of a patta transfer request can be decided without reviewing the petitioner's detailed complaint against the Tahsildar's rejecting order.
S.Elavarasan
The District Collector, Salem District
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Salem District
The Tahsildar, Pethanaickenpalayam Temple, Salem District
S.Sounthar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
