Railway employees sought continued payment of House Rent Allowance and City Compensatory Allowance at Chennai Urban Agglomeration rates via writ petition challenging a CAT tribunal order. Counsel reported no instructions from the petitioners and the court dismissed the writ petition as no instructions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP No.25280 of 2007
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 08.04.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU
WP No.25280 of 2007
1.V.Chandrasekar
... Petitioners
versus
1/5
PRAYER:
WP No.25280 of 2007
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for the issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned order in OA No.9 of 2006 dated 28.07.2006 on the file of the third respondent herein and quash the same insofar as the rejection of the petitioners prayer to quash the order of the second respondent in MP (C&P)/Misc. dated 30.11.2005 is concerned and direct the respondents 1 and 2 to continue to pay House Rent Allowance and City Compensatory Allowance to the petitioners at Chennai Urban Agglomeration (Grade A-1) rates with all consequential benefits.
For the Petitioners :Mr.P.Mohanraj For the Respondents :Mr.P.T.Ramkumar for respondents 1 and 2 Third respondent-Tribunal
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J.)
The writ petition is filed for the issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned order in OA No.9 of 2006 dated 28.07.2006 on the file of the third respondent herein and quash the same insofar as the rejection of the
2/5
WP No.25280 of 2007
petitioners prayer to quash the order of the second respondent in MP (C&P)/Misc. dated 30.11.2005 is concerned and direct the respondents 1 and 2 to continue to pay House Rent Allowance and City Compensatory Allowance to the petitioners at Chennai Urban Agglomeration (Grade A-1) rates with all consequential benefits.
for the petitioners, the writ petition stands dismissed as no instructions.
There shall be no order as to costs.
[D.K.K., J.] [K.B., J.] 08.04.2024 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No mrn
3/5
WP No.25280 of 2007
To
4/5
WP No.25280 of 2007
D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J. and K.KUMARESH BABU, J.
(mrn)
WP No.25280 of 2007
08.04.2024
5/5
1 provisions across 1 enactments
V.Chandrasekar
K.S.Balajisrinivasan
M.Sakthivel
The Union of India represented by the Joint Director Estt.(P&A), Railway Board, New Delhi
The Senior Divisional Personnel Officer/MAS, Divisional Railway Manager's Office, Personnel Branch, Chennai Division, Chennai
The Registrar, Central Administrative Tribunal, Chennai Branch
D.Krishnakumar
K.Kumaresh Babu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
