Dismissed

M/S.Bnr Infrastructure Projects (P) Ltd., v. Tamilnadu Urban Habitat Development Board(Tnudb)

Madras HC9 Aug 2024WP/23414/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition sought mandamus directing TNUDB to pay an admitted sum due under a 2017 agreement for constructing EWS tenements. Counsel conceded an identical petition had been dismissed and sought liberty to pursue arbitration; the Court dismissed the writ with liberty to raise all contract-related issues before the Arbitrator.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to petitioner to canvass all issues relating to the same contract before the learned Sole Arbitrator; no costs.

M/S.Bnr Infrastructure Projects (P) Ltd., Vs Tamilnadu Urban… — Arbitration | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P. No.23414 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 09.08.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

¶6

W.P. No.23414 of 2024

¶7

M/s.BNR Infrastructure Projects (P) Ltd., Represented by its Executive Director, Charan Prasad B

¶8

.... Petitioner

¶9

Versus

¶10

Tamil Nadu Urban Habitat Development Board (TNUDB),

¶11

Formerly, Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, Represented by its Chairman, No.5, Kamarajar Salai, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005.

¶12

... Respondent

¶13

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to pay the petitioner the admitted sum of Rs.15,58,21,884/-(Rupees Fifteen Crores Fifty – Eight Lakhs Twnety-One Thousand Eight Hundred and Eighty-Four only) admittedly due to the petitioner in relation to the construction of the 2112 EWS tenements at Kanchipuram District under the Agreement dated 19.10.2017

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.Anirudh Krishnan For Respondent : Mr.S. Karthikeyan

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

1/4

¶17

W.P. No.23414 of 2024

¶18

ORDER

¶19

When the matter came up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner fairly submitted that the writ petition involving an identical issue was disposed of by this Court on 03.06.2024 in W.P. No.13059 of 2021 and thus, the direction sought for therein, was not granted. A memo to that effect was also placed before this Court. Further, he seeks liberty to resolve the dispute between the parties in relation to the Agreement, dated 19.10.2017 before the learned Sole Arbitrator.

¶20

Recording the fair submissions as well as the Memo filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition stands dismissed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to canvass all the related issues pertaining to the same contract entered into between the same parties, which are pending before the learned Arbitrator. No costs.

¶21

09.08.2024

¶22

Index : Yes / No Internet: Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order vsi2

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

2/4

¶25

W.P. No.23414 of 2024

¶26

¶27

Tamil Nadu Urban Habitat Development Board (TNUDB),

¶28

Formerly, Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, Represented by its Chairman, No.5, Kamarajar Salai, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005.

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

3/4

¶31

W.P. No.23414 of 2024

¶32

M.DHANDAPANI, J.

¶33

vsi2

¶34

W.P. No.23414 of 2024

¶35

09.08.2024

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

4/4

M/S.Bnr Infrastructure Projects (P) Ltd., v. Tamilnadu Urban Habitat Development Board(Tnudb)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S.Bnr Infrastructure Projects (P) Ltd., v. Tamilnadu Urban Habitat Development Board(Tnudb)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.S.Kumar Vs the Superintending Engineer

V.Devi Vs the State of Tamilnadu

R.Manimaran Irsme Vs Union of India represented by Ministry of Railways

P.Gnanasekar Vs The Authorised officer

M.Padmavathi Vs the Commissioner

M.Padmavathi Vs the Commissioner