High Court allowed the petitioner's application to withdraw a writ petition filed under Article 226 seeking enhanced compensation under the Tamil Nadu Highways Act, 2001. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn without costs.
Leave granted to withdraw the writ petition; the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.21951 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED :25.09.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR
W.P No.21951 of 2024
A.Manivannan
...Petitioner
Vs.
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to refer the objection of the petitioner dated 29.9.2023 to the Civil Court for enhanced compensation under section 20 of the Tamil Nadu Highways Act 2001.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Naveen Kumar for M/s.V.Vargees Amal Raja
For Respondents 1 to 3 : Mr.P.Sathish Additional Government Pleader
1/3
W.P.No.21951 of 2024
O R D E R
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition.
is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
25.09.2024
Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No nr
To
2/3
W.P.No.21951 of 2024
Alandur, Chennai-600 016.
S.SOUNTHAR, J. nr
W.P No.21951 of 2024
25.09.2024
3/3
A.Manivannan
The District Collector
The Revenue Divisional Officer
The Land Acquisition Officer
S.Sounthar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
