Disposed

Amrin Banu v. the Regional Transport Officer

Madras HC15 Jul 2024WP/18877/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought a Writ of Mandamus directing the Regional Transport Officer to receive and consider her online application for an Auto rickshaw permit. The Court, noting the issue was already addressed in a related petition, directed the Respondent to accept the application, consider it on merits, and pass appropriate orders within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directing the Respondent to receive petitioner's application, consider it on merits, and pass appropriate orders within six weeks.

Amrin Banu Vs the Regional Transport Officer — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No. 18877 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 15. 07.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN

¶6

W.P.No.18877 of 2024

Amrin Banu

.. Petitioner

Versus

The Regional Transport Officer, Salem South, Salem District.

¶11

...Respondent

¶12

Prayer: This petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent herein to receive the application of the petitioner dated 24.06.2024 in Form CCPA

¶13

along with the prescribed fee through online for the grant of Auto rickshaw permit to operate the vehicle within radius of 30 k.m distance from Salem Town Old Bus stand, Salem and to consider the same and pass orders.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.A. Ganesan

¶15

For Respondent : Mrs. C.Meera Arumugam Additional Government Pleader

¶16

1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

W.P.No. 18877 of 2024

¶18

ORDER

¶19

This petition is filed to seeking to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent herein to receive the application of the petitioner dated 24.06.2024 in Form CCPA along with the prescribed fee paid by the petitioner through online for the grant of Auto rickshaw permit to operate the vehicle within radius of 30 k.m distance from Salem Town Old Bus stand, Salem and to consider the same and pass orders.

¶20

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent.

¶21

The issue involved in the present Writ Petition was dealt with in

¶22

the earlier Writ Petition in W.P.No.9394 of 2024 dated 10.04.2024.This Court after considering the earlier order passed in this regard, issued direction to the concerned Regional Transport Officer. Similar order can also be issued in the present case, since the said order will ensure to the benefit of the petitioner also.

¶23

2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

W.P.No. 18877 of 2024

¶25

In the result, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to

¶26

the respondent to receive the application of the petitioner dated 24.06.2024 in Form CCPA along with the prescribed fee paid by the petitioner through online for the grant of Auto rickshaw permit and consider the same on its own merits and in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

¶27

15.07.2024

¶28

Speaking order : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No Index : Yes/No gv

¶29

¶30

The Regional Transport Officer, Salem East, Salem District.

¶31

3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

W.P.No. 18877 of 2024

¶33

V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN, J.

¶34

¶35

W.P.No.18877 of 2024

¶36

15.07.2024

¶37

4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Amrin Banu v. the Regional Transport Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amrin Banu v. the Regional Transport Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tedi India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Mr.a.Shanmuga Sundaram, I.A.S.

M.Ravikumar Vs the Regional Transport Officer

P.Rajalakshmi Vs the District Collector

R.Sivaguru Vs the Joint Commissioner

K.Shankar Vs the Joint Commissioner

Nilgiri Youth Tourists Taxi Drivers Vs the Chief Secretary / Transport Commissioner