Dismissed

Tedi India Pvt. Ltd. v. Mr.a.Shanmuga Sundaram, I.A.S.

Madras HC12 Jul 2024CONT P/1305/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this contempt petition, the petitioner sought punishment for the respondent's alleged disobedience of a prior order. The respondent alleged compliance. Finding the prior issues were left open for the appropriate forum and compliance was pleaded, the court closed the petition with no costs.

What did the court decide?

Contempt petition is closed as nothing survives for further adjudication; no costs awarded.

Tedi India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Mr.a.Shanmuga Sundaram, I.A.S. — Contempt of Court | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

Cont P.No.1305 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 12.07.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN Contempt Petition No.1305 of 2024

¶6

TEDI India Pvt., Ltd., rep. By its Director, Elumalai Jayaraman No.190, North Usman Road, T.Nagar, Chennai – 600 017 ... Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

A.Shanmuga Sundaram IAS The Principal Secretary – cum - The Transport Commissioner, State Transport Authority, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005 ... Respondent

¶9

Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt

¶10

of Courts Act 1971 to punish the respondent for willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.20447 of 2023 dated 13.07.2023

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.J.Muthukumar For Respondent : Mr.N.Naveenkumar Government Advocate

¶12

1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶13

Cont P.No.1305 of 2024

¶14

O R D E R

¶15

This petition is filed to initiate contempt proceedings against the respondent for willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.20447 of 2023 dated 13.07.2023.

¶16

When the petition is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent submitted that the order passed by this Court has been complied with and hence nothing survives for adjudication, thereby pleaded to close the present Contempt Petition.

¶17

On going through the letter in R.No.12251/HB2/2021 dated 28.06.2024 by the Joint Transport Commissioner (Rules), Chennai, it is seen that application of the petitioner dated 14.10.2020 and representation of the petitioner dated 05.01.2023 were rejected. If the petitioner is aggrieved, it is left open to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy before the concerned forum in the manner known to law.

¶18

In view of the above, the Contempt Petition is closed as nothing survives for further adjudication. No costs.

¶19

12.07.2024

¶20

Speaking order : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No ssd

¶21

2/4

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

Cont P.No.1305 of 2024

¶24

¶25

A.Shanmuga Sundaram IAS The Principal Secretary – cum - The Transport Commissioner, State Transport Authority, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005

¶26

3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

Cont P.No.1305 of 2024

¶28

V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN, J.

¶29

ssd

¶30

Cont.P.No.1305 of 2024

¶31

12.07.2024

¶32

4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Tedi India Pvt. Ltd. v. Mr.a.Shanmuga Sundaram, I.A.S.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tedi India Pvt. Ltd. v. Mr.a.Shanmuga Sundaram, I.A.S.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gangadharan Vs the Commissioner

P.Poonusamy, Vs the Commissioner

K.G.Balakrishnan Vs the Registrar

M.Ravikumar Vs the Regional Transport Officer

P.Rajalakshmi Vs the District Collector

R.Sivaguru Vs the Joint Commissioner