S.Rajam v. D.Mohan IAS
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt petition alleging non-compliance with a writ order dated 21.12.2022 in W.P. No.29939 of 2022. Counsel for the petitioner stated the order had been complied with; the court recorded the statement and closed the petition.
What did the court decide?
Petition closed on recording petitioner's counsel's statement that the writ order has been complied with.
What the court decided
Cont. Petn. No.551 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 16.07.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR
Cont. Petn. No.551 of 2023
S.Rajan Proprietor M/s.Sri Senthil Agro Products Having admin office at No.9, Dhanammal Street Flat No.1/B, Ess Pee Kay Apartment Chetpet, Chennai 600 031
. . Petitioner
Vs
1.Mr.D.Mohan, I.A.S., The District Collector Master Plan Complex Collectorate, Villupuram District Villupuram - 605 602
2.Mr.Parimelazhagar The Block Development Officer Mailam Block, Mailam, Villupuram District
3.Mrs.Seethalakshmi The Block Development Officer Olakkur Block, Olakkur, Villupuram District
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.Rajan Proprietor M/s.Sri Senthil Agro Products
- respondent
Mr.D.Mohan, I.A.S., The District Collector
- respondent
Parimelazhagar, Block Development Officer Mailam Block
- respondent
Mrs.Seethalakshmi, Block Development Officer Olakkur Block
- respondent
Kesavulu, Block Development Officer Gingee Block
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court