Disposed

Chandramma v. the Tahsildar

Madras HC15 Jul 2024WP/18624/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition seeking a direction to the Tahsildar to survey the petitioner's small land holding in Chennathur Village and fix boundary stones, based on an unactioned representation. The court disposed of it at admission, directing consideration within two months after notice to neighbours.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Tahsildar to consider the petitioner's representation dated 01.05.2024 and pass orders on survey and boundary demarcation after notice, within two months.

Chandramma Vs the Tahsildar — Property and Title | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No.18624 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 15.07.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

¶6

W.P.No.18624 of 2024

Chandramma

... Petitioner

versus

The Tahsildar, Hosur Taluk Office, Hosur, Krishnagiri District. ... Respondent

¶11

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent herein to consider the petitioner's representation dated 01.05.2024 and consequently direct them to send Taluk Surveyor to survey the land and fix the boundary stone around the land in Survey No.209/5A1B to the extent of 0.05 cents situated at Chennathur Village, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.E.Kannadasan

¶13

For Respondent : Mr.P.Sathish Additional Government Pleader

¶14

1/4

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

W.P.No.18624 of 2024

¶17

O R D E R

¶18

By consent of both sides, this Writ Petition is disposed of at the

¶19

stage of admission itself.

¶20

2 . This Writ Petition is filed to direct the respondent to survey the

¶21

petitioner's land comprised in Survey No.209/5A1B, measuring an extent of

¶22

0.05 cents, situated at Chennathur Village, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District, by considering the petitioner's representation dated 01.05.2024 .

¶23

3 . Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondent and perused the materials available on record.

¶24

4 . The grievance of the petitioner is that she has given

¶25

representation dated 01.05.2024 to survey the property and demarcate its boundaries in Survey No.209/5A1B, measuring an extent of 0.05 cents, situated at Chennathur Village, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District . However,

¶26

the same has not been considered by the respondent.

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

2/4

¶29

W.P.No.18624 of 2024

¶30

5 . Considering the limited nature of the relief sought for in the

¶31

present Writ Petition, there shall be a direction to the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 01.05.2024 and pass appropriate orders, for survey of the property and demarcate its boundaries, after giving notice to the neighbouring land owners and any other interested persons, within a

¶32

period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶33

6 . With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No

¶34

costs.

¶35

15.07.2024

¶36

Speaking order / Non-speaking order Index : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No sri

¶37

¶38

The Tahsildar, Hosur Taluk Office, Hosur, Krishnagiri District.

¶39

3/4

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶41

W.P.No.18624 of 2024

¶42

N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.

¶43

sri

¶44

W.P.No.18624 of 2024

¶45

15.07.2024

¶46

4/4

¶47

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Chandramma v. the Tahsildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chandramma v. the Tahsildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Mani Vs the District Collector

R.Priyadharshini Vs Murugan and 2 Others

A.Devanbu Vs the Inspector General of Registration

A.S.Karthik Vs the District Collector

Mr. N.Ramamoorthy Vs Thiru. Thiruvarampillai

K.Natarajan Vs Thiru. Thiruvarampillai