Sandra Pushparajan v. the Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
What did the court decide?
Petitioner given one week to appear and produce documents; 2nd respondent to scrutinise and decide within two weeks; otherwise may proceed per impugned notice.
What the court decided
W.P.No.17847 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 27.08.2024
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.D.KRISHNAKUMAR ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI
W.P.No.17847 of 2024 and W.M.P.No.19590 of 2024
Mrs.Sandra Pushparajan
... Petitioner
-vs-
- The Commissioner, Greater Chennai Corporation, Ripon Building, No.1131, EVR Periyar Salai, Park Town, Chennai, Tamil Nadu-600 003.
- The Executive Engineer, Greater Chennai Corporation (Zone-X), No.117, NSK Salai, Kodambakkam, Chennai-600 024.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the lock-and-seal notice issued for allegedly unapproved construction should be quashed despite the petitioner's claimed 1991 plan approval?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mrs.Sandra Pushparajan
- respondent
The Commissioner, Greater Chennai Corporation
- respondent
The Executive Engineer, Greater Chennai Corporation (Zone-X)
- respondent
The Assistant Executive Engineer, Greater Chennai Corporation (Zone-X)
- respondent
The Assistant Engineer, Greater Chennai Corporation (Zone-X)
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court