Disposed

V.Gopal v. the Regional Transport Officer

Madras HC5 Jul 2024WP/17779/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This petition sought a writ of Mandamus directing the Regional Transport Officer to accept the petitioner's application for a CNG auto rickshaw permit and decide it within a stipulated timeframe, relying on a previous order in a related petition.

What did the court decide?

Direction to accept the petitioner's application dated 13.06.2024 in form CCPA along with prescribed fees, consider on merits, and pass orders within six weeks.

V.Gopal Vs the Regional Transport Officer — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No. 17779 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 05.07.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN

W.P.No.17779 of 2024

V. Gopal

.. Petitioner

Versus

The Regional Transport Officer, Regional Transport Office Salem (East), Salem District. ...Respondent

¶11

Prayer: This petition is filed under article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent herein to receive petitioner's application with the prescribed fees to be paid and to grant CNG auto permit to operate the vehicle within 30 k.m Radius distance from Salem Town Bus stand based on petitioner's application in

¶12

Form CCPA dated 13.06.2024 within the time frame and pass orders.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.T. Asokan

¶14

For Respondent : Mr. M. Venkaeswaran Special Government Pleader

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

1/4

¶17

W.P.No. 17779 of 2024

¶18

ORDER

¶19

This petition is filed to seeking to issue a writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent herein to receive petitioner's application with the prescribed fees to be paid and to grant CNG auto permit to operate the vehicle within 30 k.m Radius distance from Salem Town Bus stand based on petitioner's application in Form CCPA dated 13.06.2024

¶20

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondent.

¶21

The issue involved in the present Writ Petition was dealt within the earlier Writ Petition in W.P.No.9394 of 2024 dated 10.04.2024.This Court after considering the earlier passed in this regard, issued direction to the concerned Regional Transport Officer. Similar orders can also be issued in the present case, since, the said order will ensure to the benefit of the petitioner also.

¶22

2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

W.P.No. 17779 of 2024

¶24

In the result, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent to receive the application of the petitioner dated 13.06.2024 in form CCPA along with the prescribed fee paid by the petitioner through online for the grant of Auto rickshaw permit and consider the same on its own merits and in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

¶25

05.07.2024

¶26

Speaking order : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No Index : Yes/No smn

¶27

¶28

The Regional Transport Officer, Regional Transport Office Salem (East), Salem District.

¶29

3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

W.P.No. 17779 of 2024

¶31

V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN, J.

smn

W.P.No.17779 of 2024

05.07.2024

3/6

4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

V.Gopal v. the Regional Transport Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V.Gopal v. the Regional Transport Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Anandan Vs the Assistant Commissioner

A.Kalaiyarasan, Vs the Deputy Registrar of Co-Operative Society

D.Sathish Vs the Commissioner

M.Karuppasamy, Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer

S.P.Sithuraj Vs the Regional Transport Officer

S.Jeevananda Iyappan Vs the Regional Transport Officer