Disposed

Periyammal v. the District Revenue Officer

Madras HC3 Jul 2024WP/17298/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition filed by a senior citizen seeking direction to dispose of an appeal pending before the District Revenue Officer under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007. The Court directed the respondent to conduct an enquiry and pass orders within twelve weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction issued to the first respondent to dispose of Appeal No.56/2024 within twelve weeks from receipt of the Order.

Periyammal Vs the District Revenue Officer — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No. 17298 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 03.07.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN

¶6

W.P.No.17298 of 2024

¶7

Periyammal .. Petitioner

¶8

Versus

¶9

The District Revenue Officer Kallakurichi District.

¶10

The Revenue Divisional Officer Kallakurichi District.

¶11

The Social Welfare Department. Kallakurichi, Kallakurichi District.

¶12

Premkumar

¶13

...Respondents

¶14

Prayer: This petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution

¶15

of India to issue a writ of Mandamus to dispose the Appeal in application pending before the second respondent Appeal No.56/2024 as early as possible and pass orders.

¶16

For Petitioner : Mr.T. Balachandran

¶17

For Respondents 1 and 2 : Mr.P. Gurunathan,

¶18

Additional Government Pleader For Respondent-3 : Mr.M. Venkateswaran Special Government Pleader

¶19

1/6

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

W.P.No. 17298 of 2024

¶22

ORDER

¶23

This petition is filed to seeking a direction directing the second respondent to dispose the Appeal in application pending before the second respondent Appeal No.56/2024 as early as possible and pass orders.

¶24

By consent of both the parties, this writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.

¶25

3.The facts of the case are that the petitioner has settled his property to his grand son who is the fourth respondent herein vide Document bearing No.1626 of 2022 dated 09.06.2022. After obtaining the properties the petitioner was not taken care by the fourth respondent. When this being the case, the fourth respondent with an intention to grab the petitioner's property had executed the settlement deed in favour of his wife vide Doc.No.1723 of 2022 on 17.06.2022 i.e within a period of 10 days from the date i.e 09.06.2022, in which the petitioner has executed the settlement deed. Due to which the petitioner made a complaint before the first and second respondents under the Maintenance and

¶26

2/6

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

W.P.No. 17298 of 2024

¶29

Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 to cancel the settlement deed executed by her. Subsequently, the second respondent passed an order on 28.03.2023 in MMA6/3732/2022. Challenging the same the petitioner filed W.P.No.21716 of 2023 and this Court vide order dated 24.07.2023 disposed of the same wherein, it was stated since the appeal remedy is available under Section 16 of the said act, the petitioner shall approach the Appellate authority. Hence, the petitioner filed an Appeal before the first respondent in Appeal No.56/2023 challenging the order passed by the second respondent in MMA6/3732/2022 on 28.03.2023. The grievance of the petitioner is that there is no progress in the said appeal. Hence, this petition.

¶30

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is a senior citizen and he has been made to run from pillar to post to establish his case. He further submitted that the petitioner is suffering due to the age-related ailments. While so, the fourth respondent herein who is grand son of the petitioner and the beneficiary of the properties settled by the petitioner, is not taking care of the petitioner. Hence, prays to allow this petition.

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

3/6

¶33

W.P.No. 17298 of 2024

¶34

The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the first respondent submitted that they will prioritize the case of the petitioner as the petitioner is a senior citizens and will take action in the manner known to law as early as possible

¶35

6.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court directs the first respondent to dispose the appeal in Appeal No.56/2024 after conducting an enquiry by affording reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as the concerned parties and pass orders within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order.

¶36

With the aforesaid direction, this Writ Petition stands disposed

¶37

of. No costs.

¶38

03.07.2024

¶39

Speaking order : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No Index : Yes/No smn

¶40

4/6

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶42

W.P.No. 17298 of 2024

¶43

¶44

The District Social Welfare Officer Office of District Collectorate C Block, 4^th Floor, Ranipet District.

¶45

The Revenue Divisional Officer Ranipet District, Ranipet.

¶46

The sub Registrar Arcot SRO, Ranipet District.

¶47

5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶48

W.P.No. 17298 of 2024

¶49

V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN, J.

smn

W.P.No.17298of 2024

03.07.2024

6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Periyammal v. the District Revenue Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Periyammal v. the District Revenue Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Eswaran Vs the Commissioner

P.P.Ayil Naidu Vs the Tamilnadu Information Commission

P.Murali Vs the Regional Transport Officer

M.a.Khader Vs G.Abdul Salaam

M.Saradha Vs the Regional Transport Officer

D.C.Singaram Vs the Commissioner of Hindu Religious