Allowed

Saraswathi v. the Tahsildar

Madras HC5 Jun 2024WP/13427/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court issued a writ of mandamus directing the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 10.01.2024 for survey and demarcation of her land, give notice to neighbours, and pass orders within two months.

What did the court decide?

Directed the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation, give notice to neighbours, and demarcate boundaries within two months.

Saraswathi Vs the Tahsildar — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No.13427 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 05.06.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

W.P.No.13427 of 2024

Saraswathi

.. Petitioner

The Tahsildar Shoolagiri Taluk Krishnagiri District

¶11

The Head Surveyor Land Survey Section Taluk Office Madukkarai Taluk Coimbatore District .. Respondents

¶12

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to survey and measure the petitioner's land in Old S.F.No.23/2 and New S.F. No.23/2B6A1, situate at Vellalore Village, Madukkarai Taluk, Coimbatore District and fix four boundaries within a stipulated period.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Marudhachalam For Respondents : Mr.P.Sathish Additional Government Pleader

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

W.P.No.13427 of 2024

¶16

O R D E R

¶17

This writ petition is filed to direct the respondents to measure the petitioner's land viz ., Old Survey No.23/2 and New Survey No.23/2B6A1 in Vellalore Village, Madukkarai Taluk, Coimbatore District by disposing of the petitioner's representation dated 10.01.2024 and the same within a time stipulated by this court.

¶18

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned

¶19

Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents and perused the materials available on record.

¶20

The case of the petitioner is that the subject property was

¶21

acquired by her father vide Partition deed Doc.No.4123 of 1920. After his death, the property devolved on the petitioner. It is the grievance of the petitioner that she has given a representation on 10.01.2024 to survey the said property and demarcate its boundaries. However, the same has not been considered by the second respondent. Hence, the present Writ Petition.

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

W.P.No.13427 of 2024

¶24

Considering the limited relief sought in this writ petition, the

¶25

second respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 10.01.2024 and pass appropriate orders on the petitioner's representation for survey of the property and demarcate the boundaries, after giving notice to the neighbouring land owners and any other interested persons, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶26

With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of.

No costs.

05.06.2024

gya

The Tahsildar Shoolagiri Taluk Krishnagiri District

¶32

The Head Surveyor Land Survey Section Taluk Office Madukkarai Taluk Coimbatore District

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶34

W.P.No.13427 of 2024

N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.

gya

W.P.No.13427 of 2024

05.06.2024

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Saraswathi v. the Tahsildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Saraswathi v. the Tahsildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr.E.Chitra Vs Mr.Gunaji Rao

M.Venkatachalam Vs The Sub Registrar

S.Krishna Kumar Vs the Land Acquisition Officer Cum

Selvaraj Vs the Tahsildar

T.Senthilkumar Vs the Sub Registrar

A.Rajendran Vs the District Collector