Disposed

R.Subathra Devi, v. the Sub Registrar

Madras HC25 Jul 2024WP/12327/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order records the petitioner's sale certificate registration refusal due to survey number discrepancies. The court directed the Tahsildar to pass an order on the petitioner's pending application for a correlation certificate before the Sub Registrar can decide on registration.

What did the court decide?

Direction to pass order on petitioner's application dated 19.01.2024 for correlation certificate.

R.Subathra Devi, Vs the Sub Registrar — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P. No.12327 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 25.07.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

¶6

W.P.No.12327 of 2024

¶7

R.Subathra Devi ... Petitioner

¶8

¶9

1.The Sub Registrar Mettupalayam

¶10

2.The Tashildar Mettupalayam Coimbatore ... Respondents

¶11

(R2 impleaded vide order Dt.19.06.2024 made in WMP.16076/2024 in WP.12327/202)

¶12

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records on the file of respondent in proceedings Refusal Number RFL/Mettupalayam/78/2023 dated 19.08.2023, quash the same as illegal, incompetent and in any event liable to be set aside and further direction the respondent to register the sale certificate issued in favour of the petitioner by the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Coimbatore dated 19.08.2023.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mrs.R.Poornima

¶14

________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

Page 1/5

¶16

W.P. No.12327 of 2024

¶17

For Respondent : Mr.B.Vijay Addl. Govt. Pleader for R1 Mr.S.J.Mohamed Sathik, Government Advocate for R2

¶18

O R D E R

¶19

This writ petition has been filed challenging the refusal slip in Refusal Number RFL/Mettupalayam/78/2023 dated 19.08.2023 refusing to register the sale certificate issued in favour of the petitioner by the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Coimbatore.

¶20

2. It is the case of the writ petitioner that the petitioner was a successful bidder in a sale held by the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Coimbatore and a sale certificate has also been issued in favour of the petitioner in O.A. No.55 of 2014 on the file of Debts Recovery Tribunal, Coimbatore. When the sale certificate was presented for registration, a refusal slip has been issued on the ground that the survey number No.665 mentioned in the sale certificate relates to Government poramboke land. According to the writ petitioner, the old Survey No.665 is now given as new Survey No.610 and both are one and the same with same boundaries. The new Survey No.665 is government poramboke land and

¶21

________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

Page 2/5

¶23

W.P. No.12327 of 2024

¶24

its correspondent old Survey number is 1310. According to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Village Administrative Officer also given a certificate, however, the correlation has to be done only by the Tahsildar.

¶25

3. Mr.B.Vijay, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the Sub Registrar, would submit that in the 'A' Register S. No.665 is shown as the Government land. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the Tahsildar would submit that in the 'A' Register S. No.665 is shown as Odai, the petitioner has to get correlation certificate only from the Tahsildar.

¶26

4. According to the petitioner, she has already filed an application on 19.01.2024 for correlation certificate with Tahsildar, however, no order has been passed.

¶27

5. Since the entire issue is relating to the correlation certificate, the 2nd respondent is directed to pass an order on the petition given by the petitioner on 19.01.2024 and pass an order considering the Government records and on such correlation certificate, the first respondent can take a decision.

¶28

________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 3/5

¶29

W.P. No.12327 of 2024

¶30

6. The writ petition is disposed of with the above direction. However,

¶31

there is no order as to costs.

¶32

25.07.2024

¶33

Index : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No Asr

¶34

¶35

1.The Sub Registrar Mettupalayam

¶36

2.The Tashildar Mettupalayam Coimbatore

¶37

3.The Government Pleader High Court, Madras

¶38

N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.

¶39

Asr

¶40

________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶41

_______ Page 4/5_

¶42

W.P. No.12327 of 2024

¶43

W.P.No.12327 of 2024

¶44

25.07.2024

¶45

________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 5/5

R.Subathra Devi, v. the Sub Registrar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Subathra Devi, v. the Sub Registrar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Duraisamy Vs Dr. P.Senthilkumar, I.A.S.

G.Rasappa Vs the District Collector

Akbr Leathers Employees Union Vs Inspector General

M.Sekar Vs the District Collector

K.Mani Vs the District Registrar

Usha Rangarajan Vs the State of Tamil Nadu