Disposed

J.Jothimani v. the District Collector

Madras HC7 Jun 2024WP/12282/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition seeking removal of encroachments from a Government Porambokku cart track was withdrawn after arguments, as the alleged encroacher had not been impleaded. The Court permitted withdrawal with liberty to re-approach after adding the encroacher as a co-respondent, without expressing any view on merits.

What did the court decide?

Leave granted to withdraw the writ petition with all rights and contentions preserved to file afresh after impleading the alleged encroacher.

J.Jothimani Vs the District Collector — Property and Title | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No.12282 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 07.06.2024

¶4

CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR

¶5

and

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE K.GOVINDARAJAN

¶7

THILAKAVADI

¶8

W.P.No.12282 of 2024

¶9

J.Jothimani Wife of Shivakumar

¶10

... Petitioner

¶11

Vs.

¶12

The District Collector Collectorate

¶13

Thiruchengodu Road Namakkal – 637 003

¶14

The District Revenue Officer Namakkal– 637 003

¶15

The Revenue Inspector Moganoor Road, Thillaipuram Namakkal – 637 001

¶16

The Tahsildar Rasipuram ... Respondents

¶17

Page Nos.1/6

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

W.P.No.12282 of 2024

¶20

Page Nos.2/6

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

W.P.No.12282 of 2024

¶23

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to remove the encroachments in the subject cart track of 40 feet, which is situated in the Government Porambokku lands in Karkoodaipatti Bit 1 Sy.No.137/1 pursuant to the orders passed by the 2^nd respondent in Na.Ka.5862/2019/A2 dated 22.01.2020 without any further delay.

¶24

For Petitioner : Ms.P.Veena For Respondents : Mr.A.Selvendran Special Government Pleader Assisted by Mr.T.K.Saravanan Government Advocate

¶25

O R D E R

¶26

[Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR, J.,] After some arguments, Ms.P.Veena, learned counsel on record for

¶27

petitioner sought leave of this Court to withdraw the captioned 'Writ Petition' [hereinafter 'WP' for the sake of brevity] inter alia as alleged encroacher has not been made as a party to the writ petition. Learned counsel has made an endorsement in the case file and a scanned reproduction of the same is as follows:

¶28

Page Nos.3/6

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

W.P.No.12282 of 2024

¶31

Learned counsel made a request to come before this Court after

¶32

impleading the alleged encroacher as co-respondent. Request acceded to.

¶33

Captioned WP disposed of as closed / withdrawn (without

¶34

expressing any view or opinion on the merits of the case) preserving all the

¶35

Page Nos.4/6

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

W.P.No.12282 of 2024

¶38

rights and contentions of the writ petitioner to come back to this Court in the

¶39

aforesaid manner. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶40

Index : Yes / No Speaking / Non-speaking Neutral Citation : Yes / No gpa

¶41

¶42

The District Collector Collectorate

¶43

Thiruchengodu Road Namakkal – 637 003

¶44

The District Revenue Officer Namakkal – 637 003

¶45

The Revenue Inspector Moganoor Road, Thillaipuram Namakkal – 637 001

¶46

The Tahsildar Rasipuram

¶47

Page Nos.5/6

¶48

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶49

W.P.No.12282 of 2024

¶50

M.SUNDAR, J., and K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J.,

gpa

W.P.No.12282 of 2024

07.06.2024

Page Nos.6/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

J.Jothimani v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

J.Jothimani v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.K.R.Venkatesan Vs M.Selvanambi

D.Prema Vs M/s. Shiva Texyarn Ltd.

Guna Vs J.Durga

P.R.Samabasivam Vs the Principal Secretary

Ramasamy, Vs the District Collector

L.Balaji Vs the State of Tamilnadu