Dismissed

Parinitha Manpower Management v. The Oil & Natural Gas

Madras HC20 Sept 2024WP/12207/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition seeking a mandamus restraining ONGC from insisting on employment of certain workers under a manpower supply contract was dismissed as infructuous after the petitioner reported the contract had lapsed with efflux of time. The connected miscellaneous petition was closed.

What did the court decide?

None granted; writ petition dismissed as infructuous, no costs, connected miscellaneous petition closed.

Parinitha Manpower Management Vs The Oil & Natural Gas — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No.12207 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 20.09.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA

¶6

W.P.No.12207 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015

¶7

Parinitha Manpower Management Agency A Partnership Firm rep by it’s Partner R.Bharathi, Having Office at Old No:2 New No:17 Thiruvenkatam Street, Virugambakkam, Chennai - 92. ... Petitioner

¶8

versus

¶9

1.The Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited, Rep. by it’s Chairman, Jeevan Bharathi Tower-II, 124, Connaught Circus, New Delhi - 110 001.

¶10

2.The Deputy General Manager [P], O/o Head Well Services, Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited, Cauvery Asset, Neravy Complex, Karaikal - 609 604.

¶11

3.The Manager [MM], Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited, Cauvery Asset, Neravy Complex, Karaikal - 609 604.

¶12

1/4

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

W.P.No.12207 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015

¶15

4.The Assistant Labour Commissioner, Puducherry.

¶16

5.S.Jayaraj 6.R.Venugopal 7.M.Selvam 8.K.Karunanidhi 9.V.Muthuvasanthan ... Respondents

¶17

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents 1 to 3 from insisting employment of respondents 5 to 9 herein by the petitioner in connection with work given to the petitioner in contract No.KKL/MM/F/15/JOB-CON-PTYS/13-14/9010018878 for upkeeping of equipments at PTYS, Polagam and Pulivalam yard.

¶18

For Petitioner : Mr.M.J.Srinivas For Respondent Nos.1, 3, 5, : No Appearance 6 to 8 For Respondent No.2 : Mr.M.Vijayan for M/s.King & Partridge For Respondent No.4 : Mrs.M.Jayanthy Additional Government Pleader

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

When the matter is taken up today, t he learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that i n view of the efflux of time, the contract under which the petitioner got his engagement has been lapsed. Hence, the subject matter has also become infructuous.

¶21

2/4

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

W.P.No.12207 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015

¶24

2 . In view of the same, this Writ Petition i s dismissed as infructuous . No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 20.09.2024 Speaking order / Non-speaking order Index : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No sri

¶25

¶26

The Assistant Labour Commissioner, Puducherry.

¶27

3/4

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

W.P.No.12207 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015

¶30

R.N.MANJULA, J.

¶31

sri

¶32

W.P.No.12207 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015

¶33

20.09.2024

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

4/4

Parinitha Manpower Management v. The Oil & Natural Gas

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Parinitha Manpower Management v. The Oil & Natural Gas

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Management, Vs The Presiding Officer

The Management Vs The Appellate Authority

J.N.Ranganathan Vs the Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies (Housing)

G.Krithika Vs S.P.Chitra

M.Nallasamy Vs The Director

Chemoil Advanced Management Vs Appellate Authority/ Deputy