Disposed

S.Vijayalakshmi v. The District Collector

Madras HC27 Jun 2024WP/12174/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition filed by a mother seeking action against her children for non-maintenance under the Senior Citizens Act. The court directed the Revenue Divisional Officer to pass orders after completing the enquiry by giving an opportunity of hearing within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed the Revenue Divisional Officer to pass orders after enquiry with an opportunity of hearing within six weeks.

S.Vijayalakshmi Vs The District Collector — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No.12174 of 2021

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 27.06.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶6

W.P.No.12174 of 2021

¶7

S.Vijayalakshmi ... Petitioner

¶8

Vs. 1.The District Collector, Chengalpettu, Chengalpettu 2.The Tahsildar, Pallavaram Tahsildar Office, Kurinji Nagar, Kanni Koil Street, Chrompet, Chennai 600 044 3.The Sub Registrar, No.7, 2 nd Main Road, New Colony, Chrompet, Chennai 600 044 4.Baskeran V 5.B.Vijay ... Respondents

¶9

PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India p raying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to consider petitioner representation on 01.02.2021 and take necessary action against the respondents 4 and 5 under Protection of Senior Citizen and Aged Parents Act.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Venkatesan

¶11

For Respondents

¶12

1/4

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

W.P.No.12174 of 2021

¶15

For R1 to 3 : Mr.S.J.Mohammed Sathik, Government Advocate

¶16

For R4 & 5 : Mr.J.Antony Jesuraja

¶17

ORDER

¶18

T his writ petition has been filed for direction to the first respondent to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner dated 01.02.2021.

¶19

The petitioner is being the mother submitted representation

¶20

in order to take appropriate action as against respondents 4 & 5 herein under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007. On receipt of the same, the first respondent forwarded the representation to the jurisdiction Revenue Divisional officer.

¶21

The learned counsel for respondents 4 & 5 submitted that

¶22

the Revenue Divisional Officer, Chengalpet issued notice to the petitioner as well as respondents 4 & 5 and conducted enquiry and yet to pass final

¶23

order.

¶24

2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

W.P.No.12174 of 2021

¶26

In view of the above, the Revenue Divisional Officer,

¶27

Tambaram is directed to pass orders after completion of enquiry by giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and respondents 4 & 5 herein within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order, if not already passed final order.

¶28

With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of.

¶29

There shall be no order as to costs.

¶30

27.06.2024

¶31

Neutral citation: Yes/No Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order lok

¶32

3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

W.P.No.12174 of 2021

¶34

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

¶35

lok

¶36

¶37

1.The District Collector, Chengalpettu, Chengalpettu

¶38

2.The Tahsildar, Pallavaram Tahsildar Office, Kurinji Nagar, Kanni Koil Street, Chrompet, Chennai 600 044

¶39

3.The Sub Registrar,

¶40

No.7, 2 nd Main Road, New Colony, Chrompet, Chennai 600 044

¶41

W.P.No.12174 of 2021

¶42

27.06.2024

¶43

4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

S.Vijayalakshmi v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Vijayalakshmi v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramalingam Vs The District Collector

S.Jesima Vs the district collector

R.Bhuvaneshwari Vs M/s.Corporation Bank

S.Arumugam Vs the Chief Engineer

V.Santhanalakshmi@Lakshmi (Senior Citizen) Vs The Additional Chief Secretary to Government

T.N.Kripanandan Vs Insolvency and bankruptcy Board of India