Dismissed

T.Johnson Brucelee, v. The Director General of Police

Madras HC12 Feb 2024WP/11027/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a one-page order where the High Court of Judicature at Madras dismissed Writ Petition No. 11027 of 2018 by granting the petitioner permission to withdraw the matter, subsequently closing the connected miscellaneous petition.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition was granted; consequently, the Writ Petition and connected miscellaneous petition were dismissed and closed.

T.Johnson Brucelee, Vs The Director General of Police — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No. 11027 of 2018

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 12.02.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

¶6

W.P.No. 11027 of 2018 and W.M.P.No. 12937 of 2018

¶7

T. Johnson Brucelee ... Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

1.The Director General of Police, Police Head Quarters, Kamarajar Salai, Chennai – 600 005.

¶10

2.The Commissioner of Police Greater Chennai Police, E.V.K. Sampath Salai, Vepery, Chennai – 600 007.

¶11

3.The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Adyar District, Chennai. ... Respondents

¶12

Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of impugned order passed by the third respondent vide P.R.No.93/P.R. S(2)/2016 dated 30.11.2016 as confirmed by the second respondent vide its order dated 15.02.2018 with reference No.Rc.No.PR V (1)/CPO/105/56200/2017 and quash the same and also to consequently direct the respondents to provide all benefits, including promotion, to the petitioner that were withheld on account of the impugned order.

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

1/4

¶15

For Petitioner : Mr. E. Paramasivan

¶16

W.P.No. 11027 of 2018

¶17

O R D E R

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the subsequent

¶19

developments happened during the pendency of this writ petition, the learned counsel sought permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition. Permission is granted.

¶20

2 . Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶21

3 . Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶22

4 . There shall be no order as to costs.

¶23

12.02.2024

¶24

Index :Yes/No Neutral Citation :Yes/No

¶25

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

2/4

¶28

W.P.No. 11027 of 2018

¶29

¶30

1.The Director General of Police, Police Head Quarters, Kamarajar Salai,

¶31

Chennai – 600 005.

¶32

2.The Commissioner of Police Greater Chennai Police, E.V.K. Sampath Salai,

¶33

Vepery, Chennai – 600 007.

¶34

3.The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Adyar District, Chennai.

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

3/4

¶37

W.P.No. 11027 of 2018

¶38

BATTU DEVANAND, J.

¶39

¶40

W.P.No. 11027 of 2018 and W.M.P.No. 12937 of 2018

¶41

12.02.2024

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶43

4/4

T.Johnson Brucelee, v. The Director General of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

T.Johnson Brucelee, v. The Director General of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Srinivasan, S/o.Ramasamy Vs State of Tamilnadu, Rep by its

S.veeran, Vs The Director General

P.Arukkaniammal Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

K.Kamalanabhan, Vs Commissioner of Agriculture

Dr.T.Antan Ureshkumar, Vs The Government of Tamilnadu

Vijay Vs Principal Chief Conservator