The petitioner sought to withdraw a writ petition challenging an order denying VII Pay Commission recommendations. The court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P. No.17642 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 09.02.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
W.P. No.17642 of 2018 and W.M.P. No.20905 of 2018
R. Srinivasan Petitioner
v
Writ Petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorariried mandamus calling for the records relating to the order dated 17.01.2018 passed by the third respondent in Na.Ka.No.853/2016 and the consequential order dated 29.01.2018 passed in Na.Ka.no.853 m1 and quash the same, thereby, directing the respondents to sanction VII Pay Commission recommendation applicable to the petitioner along with interest.
For petitioner Mr. A.R. Nixon For respondents Mrs. Akila Rajendran Government Advocate
1/2
W.P. No.17642 of 2018
BATTU DEVANAND, J.
cad
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and he has also made an endorsement in the writ petition to that effect.
learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Costs made easy. Connected W.M.P. stands closed.
09.02.2024
W.P. No.17642 of 2018
2/2
R. Srinivasan
State of Tamil Nadu represented by its Secretary Finance (Pension) Department
The Accountant General
The Assistant Treasury Officer Mannarkudi
BATTU DEVANAND
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
