2.In the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, it had been contended that the petitioner had purchased house property measuring around 400 sq.ft., under a registered Sale Deed dated 27.04.1989 registered as Document No.709 of 1989 on the file of the Sub-Registrar, Royapuram, Chennai. He had purchased it from one Kuppuraj. It is contended that the petitioner was in continuous enjoyment and also obtained electricity service connection. He is also paying property tax and other statutory charges. At the time of purchase a thatched house was there. The petitioner then put up a terraced house with asbestos roof. He had constructed the house in the year 1990. He had not obtained any planning approval. He had not carried out any construction after the year 1990. The 6th respondent who is a neighbour of the petitioner and is also residing at Vinayagapuram at Chennai, in the same locality had raised objections for the occupation of the petitioner in his place and had given representation in that regard. The matter was heard and it had been concluded that the petitioner had put up the building unauthorizedly without any approval. It had also been stated that the building has been constructed by encroaching the public road belonging to the Chennai Corporation. It had therefore been stated that Greater Chennai Corporation had issued notice under Section 220 r/w Section 222 of CCMC
