V.Kumaresan, v. Area Engineer IX
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ Petition filed to quash premises-related proceedings was dismissed as the legal issue had become infructuous per the petitioner's counsel's endorsement.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as infructuous; connected writ miscellaneous petition closed.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 18.12.2024
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
W.P.No.7397 of 2017 and W.M.P.No.8054 of 2017
V.Kumaresan .. Petitioner Vs.
Area Engineer IX, Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply & Sewerage Board, No.1, Dr.Ranga Road, Alwarpet, Chennai – 600 018. .. Respondent
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records on the file of the respondent pursuant to the impugned proceedings No.3856 dated 08.03.2017 dated 08.03.2017 in respect of petitioner's premises at No.26, G.N.Chetty Road, T.Nagar, Chennai – 17 and to quash the same.
For Petitioner .. Ms.B.Sripadmaja For Respondent .. Ms.K.Vasanthamala, Govt. Advocate.
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN,J.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V. Kumaresan
- respondent
Area Engineer IX, Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply & Sewerage Board
Coram
C.V. Karthikeyan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court