Dismissed

N.Manivannan v. The District Collector

Madras HC10 Jul 2024WP/10148/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition sought directions to cancel an allegedly forged patta document and issue a separate patta for land in Kalvarayan Malai. Government Advocate informed the court that individual Patta No.510 dated 28.03.2023 had been issued to the petitioner. Holding nothing survived for adjudication, the court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous and closed the connected miscellaneous petition.

What the court decided

AI extract

N.Manivannan Vs The District Collector — Property and Title | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No.10148 of 2019

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 10.07.2024

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD

¶6

W.P.No.10148 of 2019

¶7

and W.M.P.No.10709 of 2019

N.Manivannan

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The District Collector,

¶12

Villupuram, Villupuram District.

¶13

2.The Sub Collector, Office of the Sub Collector, Kallakurichi, Villupuram District.

¶14

3.The District Revenue Officer, Villupuram, Villupuram District.

¶15

4.The Tahsildar,

¶16

Chinna Salem, Villupuram District.

¶17

5.Chinnappan ... Respondents

¶18

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the second respondent herein to take

¶19

action on the petitioner's representation dated 29.01.2019 based upon the

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/4

¶21

W.P.No.10148 of 2019

¶22

communication of the third respondent herein vide O.Mu.Aa3/2095/2019 dated 06.02.2019 and direct the second respondent to cancel the forged document created in Survey No.145/4 by the fifth respondent herein and direct him to provide a separate patta for him for his land situated in the Kalvarayan Malai, Parnginaththam Maduraa Malliyampaati Village.

¶23

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Saravanakumar For Respondents : For R1 to R4 : Mr.K.Suresh Government Advocate For R5 : Mr.M.Marimuthu

¶24

ORDER

¶25

When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is represented by the learned

¶26

Government Advocate for the first to fourth respondents that individual patta has been issued to the petitioner vide Patta No.510 dated 28.03.2023.

¶27

In view of the above submission made by the learned Government Advocate for the first to fourth respondents, nothing survives for further adjudication in this writ petition.

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/4

¶29

2/4

¶30

W.P.No.10148 of 2019

¶31

Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

¶32

Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶33

10.07.2024

¶34

Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order Neutral Citation : Yes/No

¶35

arb

¶36

¶37

1.The District Collector, Villupuram, Villupuram District.

¶38

2.The Sub Collector, Office of the Sub Collector, Kallakurichi, Villupuram District.

¶39

3.The District Revenue Officer, Villupuram, Villupuram District.

¶40

4.The Tahsildar, Chinna Salem, Villupuram District.

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/4

¶42

W.P.No.10148 of 2019

¶43

J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.

¶44

arb

¶45

W.P.No.10148 of 2019

¶46

and W.M.P.No.10709 of 2019

¶47

10.07.2024

¶48

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/4

N.Manivannan v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

N.Manivannan v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lathamangesh Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer

N.Kothandan Vs The District Revenue Officer

E.Radha Krishnan Vs The Special Tahsildar (Adhi Dravidar Welfare)

The Archdiocese of Madras-Mylapore Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

The Archdiocese of Madras-Mylapore Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

A.Vijayakulasekara Guptha Vs The Inspector General of Registration