Disposed

Lathamangesh v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

Madras HC9 Jul 2024WP/8241/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Madras disposed of Writ Petition No.8241 of 2018 filed by Lathamangesh seeking mandamus for mutation of name in Patta No.886. The Court noted that the underlying appeal was disposed of vide order dated 08.07.2024, rendering the writ petition unnecessary.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition is closed as the underlying appeal has been disposed of; no costs awarded.

Lathamangesh Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No.8241 of 2018

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 09.07.2024

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD

W.P.No.8241 of 2018

Lathamangesh

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Namakkal.

¶11

2.The Thasildar, Namakkal.

¶12

3.Jegathambal

¶13

... Respondents

¶14

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the first respondent to dispose the Appeal vide proceedings in Na.Ka.No.7866/2015 dated 16.11.2015 relating to mutation of Petitioner's name in Patta No.886 concerning agriculture land in Survey No.195/3 comprising of 0.695 hectare situated in Rasipuram Village, Namakkal District.

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/5

¶16

W.P.No.8241 of 2018

¶17

For Petitioner : Mr.N.S.Sivakumar For Respondents : For R1 and R2 : Mr.K.Surendran Additional Government Pleader For R3 : No appearance

¶18

ORDER

¶19

When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is represented by the learned Additional Government Pleader for the first and second respondents that the appeal filed by the petitioner has been disposed by the second respondent vide order in Na.Ka.No.1816/2024/A2 dated 08.07.2024 and he has also circulated the copy of the order after duly serving the same to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.

¶20

Relevant portion of the order passed by the second respondent is

¶21

extracted hereunder for better understanding:

¶22

“,e;neh;tpy;. jpUkjp/yjhk';nf!;. j-bg/Rg;igad; vd;gth; ,uhrpghisak; fpuhkk;. gl;lh vz;/886. g[y vz;/195-3 bkhj;j gug;g[ bcwf;/0/69/5 Vh;!; epyj;jpw;F gl;lh khWjy; nfhhpa brd;id cah;ePjpkd;wj;jpy; bjhlh;e;j tHf;F vz;/W.P.No.8241-2018 ?kD bjhlh;ghf. kDjhuh; kw;Wk;

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/5

¶24

W.P.No.8241 of 2018

¶25

vjph;kDjhuh;fis 08/06/2024. 25/06/2024 kw;Wk; 05/07/2024 Mfpa njjpfspy; tprhuiz bra;ag;gl;lJ/ nkw;go egh;fis tprhuiz bra;jJ kw;Wk; Mtz';fspd; mog;gilapy;. capy; vGjp bfhLj;j Rg;igad ; jdpg;gl;lhjhuh; my;y vd;gJ bjhpa tUfpwJ/ Mdhy; ,we;J nghd Rg;igad; nkhfD}h; rhh;gjpthsh; mYtyf Mtz vz;/73-2013. ehs;/26/12/2013?d;go g[y vz;/195-3 bkhj;j gug;g[ bcwf;/0/69/5 Vh;!; epyk; KGtija[k; yjhk';nf!; vd;gth; bgaUf;F capy; vGjp itj;Js;shh;/ nkw;go g[y vz; fpuhk m?gjpntl;oy; Rg;igad; j-bg gHdprhkp kw;Wk; bghpaf;fhs; f-bg Rg;igad; bgah;fspy; Tl;lhf cs;sJ/ ,e;neh;tpy;. g[y vz;/195-3 bkhj;j gug;g[ bcwf;/0/69/5 Vh;!; epyj;jpy; kDjhuh; kw;Wk; vjph; kDjhuh;fs; Mfpa K:d;W egh;fspd; bgah;fs; TR 2018/0103/09/080312-R ehs ; 29/01/2018?d;go Vw;fdnt Tl;lhf nrh;j;J gl;lh khWjy; bra;ag;gl;Ls;sJ/ vdnt nkhfD}h; rhh;gjpthsh; mYtyf Mtz vz;/73-2013. ehs;/26/12/2013 vd;w capy; bray;gLj;j ,ayhj epiyapy; cs;sjhYk;. nkw;go capy; rhrdg;go gl;lh khWjy; bra;a ,ayhJ vd;gjhy;. ,k;kD js;Sgo bra;J cj;jutplg;gLfpwJ/ nkYk; ,J bjhlh;ghf. kDjhuh; chpikapay; ePjpkd;wk; K:yk; chpa ghpfhuk; njo bfhs;syhk; vd bjhptpf;fg;gLfpwJ/”

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/5

¶27

W.P.No.8241 of 2018

¶28

In view of the above, nothing survives for further adjudication in this writ petition and is accordingly closed. No costs.

¶29

09.07.2024

¶30

Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order Neutral Citation : Yes/No

¶31

arb

¶32

¶33

1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Namakkal.

¶34

2.The Thasildar, Namakkal.

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/5

¶36

W.P.No.8241 of 2018

¶37

J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.

arb

W.P.No.8241 of 2018

09.07.2024

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 5/5

Lathamangesh v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lathamangesh v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Kalpana Mahalingam Vs Usha

M.D.Mohan, Vs The Sub-Registrar

Good Shepherd Convent Vs The Secretary

N.Kothandan Vs The District Revenue Officer

E.Radha Krishnan Vs The Special Tahsildar (Adhi Dravidar Welfare)

Tmt.Sathiya Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer