Allowed

G.Natarajan v. Foreigner Regional Registration officer (Frro)

Madras HC11 Jan 2024WMP/597/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court granted an interim direction permitting the petitioner to travel from Chennai to Singapore for 30 days subject to ten specific conditions regarding affidavits, documentation, reporting to investigation officers, and informing authorities.

What did the court decide?

Permission to travel from Chennai to Singapore for 30 days granted with conditions including filing affidavits, submitting travel details, and reporting to investigation officers and embassies.

G.Natarajan Vs Foreigner Regional Registration officer… — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

WMP.No.597 of 2024 in

¶2

WMP.No.597 of 2024 in W.P.No.33470 of 2022

¶3

WP.No.33470 of 2022

¶4

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

¶5

This petition has been filed to grant an order of interim direction permitting the petitioner to travel from Chennai to Singapore for a period of 30 days from 10^th January 2024 to 10^th February 2024.

¶6

Heard both sides.

¶7

Ordered as prayed for, with the following conditions:

¶8

“1.The petitioner shall file an affidavit before the

¶9

Judicial Magistrate No.1, Alandur, giving the probable date of his departure and arrival along with the photocopy of his flight ticket and visa details;

¶10

2.The petitioner shall provide his contact details in Singapore;

¶11

3.The petitioner shall undertake to make himself

¶12

available for investigation as and when he is called for by

¶13

the Investigation Officer;

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

WMP.No.597 of 2024 in W.P.No.33470 of 2022

¶16

4.The petitioner shall produce a copy of the document

¶17

No.3140 of 2002, which stands in the name of his wife, along with original. The photocopy shall be retained by the Court concerned, returning the original to the petitioner;

¶18

5.The petitioner shall furnish a copy of his itinerary to

¶19

the Investigation Officer before leaving for Singapore;

¶20

6.Before leaving India, he should also inform the

¶21

Indian Embassy about his travel back to India;

¶22

7.On landing in Singapore, the petitioner shall report before the Indian Embassy at Singapore about his arrival and place of stay;

¶23

8.The petitioner is permitted to go to Singapore between 10^th January 2024 to 10^th February 2024 and he shall return back to India on or before 10^th February 2024.

¶24

9.On his return to India, she shall report before the

¶25

Investigation Officer about his arrival on or before 10^th February 2024.

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

WMP.No.597 of 2024 in W.P.No.33470 of 2022

¶28

10.The petitioner, after coming back to Chennai, shall

¶29

inform the Court about the same;

¶30

11.The petitioner shall submit a copy of his tour

¶31

itinerary details to the first respondent.”

¶32

For Reporting compliance, post the case on 15.02.2024.

¶33

11.01.2024

¶34

rri

¶35

Note: Issue order copy by 12.01.2024.

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

WMP.No.597 of 2024 in W.P.No.33470 of 2022

¶38

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

¶39

rri

¶40

WMP.No.597 of 2024 in WP.No.33470 of 2022

¶41

11.01.2024

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

G.Natarajan v. Foreigner Regional Registration officer (Frro)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G.Natarajan v. Foreigner Regional Registration officer (Frro)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Inthira Vs State Rep by

Alamelu Vs State Repp by

A.Paul Vincent Vs the State Represent by

K.Selvamani Vs State Rep by

Pachiyammal Vs Raguvaran

V.Babu Vs the State Rep by